From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-459492-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 69315 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2017 10:43:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69298 invoked by uid 89); 1 Aug 2017 10:43:57 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=drastically, Hx-languages-length:342, H*Ad:U*sandra
X-HELO: ainaz.pair.com
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (HELO ainaz.pair.com) (209.68.2.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Aug 2017 10:43:56 +0000
Received: from ainaz.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F083F627;	Tue,  1 Aug 2017 06:43:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [172.20.3.246] (unknown [12.235.85.130])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CBF133F60A;	Tue,  1 Aug 2017 06:43:51 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 10:43:00 -0000
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org>
cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de>,     "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,     Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>,     Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,     Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>, nd@arm.com,     Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,     Marcus Shawcroft <Marcus.Shawcroft@arm.com>,     Takahiro Akashi <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,     Andrew Wafaa <Andrew.Wafaa@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12] add -fpatchable-function-entry=N,M option
In-Reply-To: <F3E4420A-1F0D-48F0-978B-4A6C0B65A4E1@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.1708010442150.25964@anthias.pfeifer.com>
References: <20170706140311.GA20710@suse.de> <d3e6d7a1-1f1c-c0b5-133a-0ab29eb5034d@arm.com> <20170707193028.GA17752@suse.de> <mvmbmo7uvuu.fsf@suse.de> <20170726142629.GG22969@suse.de> <mvm379juv2y.fsf@suse.de> <F3E4420A-1F0D-48F0-978B-4A6C0B65A4E1@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2017-08/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2

On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> I don't see an easy way to correctly differentiate between "attribute" 
> nops and "bundle" nops, so XFAILing these tests on ia64 seems like a 
> valid approach.

Make sense, given that the use of Itanium has gone done drastically.

Gerald