public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>
Cc: marxin <mliska@suse.cz>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,     Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>,
	Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] Enhance documentation of gcov.
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 08:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.1807221234110.5444@anthias.pfeifer.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <694454c8-6039-9cb4-bcb8-ef210bbc7ea0@gmail.com>

On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> 2017-04-27  Martin Liska  <mliska@suse.cz>
>>
>> 	* doc/gcov.texi: Enhance documentation of gcov.
> Since I started picking on this change set I might as well keep
> at it ;)   Just a tiny nit: the sentence is missing a preposition:
> 
>   depending <ins>on </ins> whether a basic block is reachable.

This adds a bit more.  Applied.

(This section still needs a bit more love, ideally by a native
speaker.)

Gerald


2018-07-22  Gerald Pfeifer  <gerald@pfeifer.com>

	* doc/gcov.texi (Invoking Gcov): Editorial changes.

Index: doc/gcov.texi
===================================================================
--- doc/gcov.texi	(revision 262161)
+++ doc/gcov.texi	(working copy)
@@ -378,12 +378,12 @@
 containing no code.  Unexecuted lines are marked @samp{#####} or
 @samp{=====}, depending on whether they are reachable by
 non-exceptional paths or only exceptional paths such as C++ exception
-handlers, respectively. Given @samp{-a} option, unexecuted blocks are
+handlers, respectively. Given the @samp{-a} option, unexecuted blocks are
 marked @samp{$$$$$} or @samp{%%%%%}, depending on whether a basic block
 is reachable via non-exceptional or exceptional paths.
 Executed basic blocks having a statement with zero @var{execution_count}
-end with @samp{*} character and are colored with magenta color with @option{-k}
-option.  The functionality is not supported in Ada.
+end with @samp{*} character and are colored with magenta color with
+the @option{-k} option.  This functionality is not supported in Ada.
 
 Note that GCC can completely remove the bodies of functions that are
 not needed -- for instance if they are inlined everywhere.  Such functions

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-22  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-28  9:31 [PATCH 0/8] GCOV improvements marxin
2017-04-28  9:31 ` [PATCH 2/8] Remove .gcno file when compilation does not success (PR driver/56469) marxin
2017-04-28 12:00   ` Nathan Sidwell
2017-04-28  9:31 ` [PATCH 5/8] Make gcno more precise about BBs really belonging to a line (PR gcov-profile/79891) marxin
2017-04-28 11:47   ` Nathan Sidwell
2017-04-28 13:06     ` Martin Liška
2017-04-28  9:31 ` [PATCH 4/8] Introduce new option -w which shows verbose informations marxin
2017-04-28 11:41   ` Nathan Sidwell
2017-04-28  9:31 ` [PATCH 1/8] gcno file: do not stream block flags (PR gcov-profile/80031) marxin
2017-04-28 11:48   ` Nathan Sidwell
2017-04-28  9:31 ` [PATCH 6/8] Fix format_gcov to not print misleading values (PR gcov-profile/53915) marxin
2017-04-28 11:38   ` Nathan Sidwell
2017-04-28 10:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] Sort options of gcov, gcov-dump and gcov-tool both in --help and documentation marxin
2017-04-28 11:32   ` Nathan Sidwell
2017-04-28 11:25 ` [PATCH 8/8] Enhance documentation of gcov marxin
2017-04-28 11:35   ` Nathan Sidwell
2017-04-29  3:20   ` Martin Sebor
2018-07-22  8:40     ` Gerald Pfeifer [this message]
2017-04-28 11:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] Simplify representation of locations of a block marxin
2017-04-28 11:57   ` Nathan Sidwell
2017-04-28 16:40     ` Martin Sebor
2017-04-28 17:48       ` Nathan Sidwell
2017-05-02 15:38         ` [PATCH] Fix documentation and a ctor in gcov.c Martin Liška
2017-05-03 13:20           ` Nathan Sidwell
2017-04-28 19:13       ` [PATCH 3/8] Simplify representation of locations of a block Pedro Alves
2017-04-28 19:46         ` Martin Sebor
2017-04-28 20:07         ` Pedro Alves
2017-04-28 12:03 ` [PATCH 0/8] GCOV improvements Nathan Sidwell
2017-04-28 12:16   ` Martin Liška
2017-04-29 16:31     ` Gerald Pfeifer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.21.1807221234110.5444@anthias.pfeifer.com \
    --to=gerald@pfeifer.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=mliska@suse.cz \
    --cc=msebor@gmail.com \
    --cc=nathan@acm.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).