From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: detecting copy-init context during CTAD [PR102137]
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 14:14:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b0af0762-ea88-57f3-8ffc-d5abc036700c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a6b54333-a7ad-67ec-a04b-c5a6f5b1f444@idea>
On 3/7/22 10:47, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Mar 2022, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
>> On 3/4/22 14:24, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>> Here we're failing to communicate to cp_finish_decl from tsubst_expr
>>> that we're in a copy-initialization context (via the LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING
>>> flag), which causes do_class_deduction to always consider explicit
>>> deduction guides when performing CTAD for a templated variable initializer.
>>>
>>> We could fix this by passing LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING appropriately when
>>> calling cp_finish_decl from tsubst_expr, but it seems do_class_deduction
>>> can determine if we're in a copy-init context by simply inspecting the
>>> initializer, and thus render its flags parameter unnecessary, which is
>>> what this patch implements. (If we were to fix this in tsubst_expr
>>> instead, I think we'd have to inspect the initializer in the same way
>>> in order to detect a copy-init context?)
>>
>> Hmm, does this affect conversions as well?
>>
>> Looks like it does:
>>
>> struct A
>> {
>> explicit operator int();
>> };
>>
>> template <class T> void f()
>> {
>> T t = A();
>> }
>>
>> int main()
>> {
>> f<int>(); // wrongly accepted
>> }
>>
>> The reverse, initializing via an explicit constructor, is caught by code in
>> build_aggr_init much like the code your patch adds to do_auto_deduction;
>> perhaps we should move/copy that code to cp_finish_decl?
>
> Ah, makes sense. Moving that code from build_aggr_init to
> cp_finish_decl broke things, but using it in both spots seems to work
> well. And I suppose we might as well use it in do_class_deduction too,
> since doing so lets us remove the flags parameter.
Before removing the flags parameter please try asserting that it now
matches is_copy_initialization and see if anything breaks.
> -- >8 --
>
> Subject: [PATCH] c++: detecting copy-init context during CTAD [PR102137]
>
> Here we're failing to communicate to cp_finish_decl from tsubst_expr
> that we're in a copy-initialization context (via the LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING
> flag), which causes us to always consider explicit deduction guides when
> performing CTAD for a templated variable initializer.
>
> It turns out this bug also affects consideration of explicit conversion
> operators for the same reason. But consideration of explicit constructors
> is unaffected and seems to work correctly thanks to code in build_aggr_init
> that sets LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING when the initializer represents
> copy-initialization.
>
> This patch factors out the copy-initialization test from build_aggr_init
> and reuses it in tsubst_expr for sake of cp_finish_decl. And we might
> as well use it in do_class_deduction too, since doing so lets us get rid
> of its flags parameter (which is used only to control whether explicit
> deduction guides are considered).
>
> Bootstrapped and regtestd on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
> trunk?
>
> PR c++/102137
> PR c++/87820
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> * cp-tree.h (is_copy_initialization): Declare.
> (do_auto_deduction): Remove flags parameter.
> * decl.cc (cp_finish_decl): Adjust call to do_auto_deduction.
> * init.cc (build_aggr_init): Split out copy-initialization
> check into ...
> (is_copy_initialization): ... here.
> * pt.cc (convert_template_argument): Adjust call to
> do_auto_deduction.
> (tsubst_expr) <case VAR_DECL>: Pass LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING
> to cp_finish_decl when is_copy_initialization.
> (do_class_deduction): Remove flags parameter, and instead
> call is_copy_initialization to determine if we're in a copy-init
> context.
> (do_auto_deduction): Adjust call to do_class_deduction.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * g++.dg/cpp0x/explicit15.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction108.C: New test.
> ---
> gcc/cp/cp-tree.h | 4 +--
> gcc/cp/decl.cc | 2 +-
> gcc/cp/init.cc | 20 +++++++++---
> gcc/cp/pt.cc | 23 ++++++++------
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/explicit15.C | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction108.C | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/explicit15.C
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction108.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> index ac723901098..be556d2c441 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> @@ -7039,6 +7039,7 @@ extern void emit_mem_initializers (tree);
> extern tree build_aggr_init (tree, tree, int,
> tsubst_flags_t);
> extern int is_class_type (tree, int);
> +extern bool is_copy_initialization (tree);
> extern tree build_zero_init (tree, tree, bool);
> extern tree build_value_init (tree, tsubst_flags_t);
> extern tree build_value_init_noctor (tree, tsubst_flags_t);
> @@ -7279,8 +7280,7 @@ extern tree do_auto_deduction (tree, tree, tree,
> = tf_warning_or_error,
> auto_deduction_context
> = adc_unspecified,
> - tree = NULL_TREE,
> - int = LOOKUP_NORMAL);
> + tree = NULL_TREE);
> extern tree type_uses_auto (tree);
> extern tree type_uses_auto_or_concept (tree);
> extern void append_type_to_template_for_access_check (tree, tree, tree,
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> index 199ac768d43..152f657e9f2 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> @@ -8039,7 +8039,7 @@ cp_finish_decl (tree decl, tree init, bool init_const_expr_p,
> outer_targs = DECL_TI_ARGS (decl);
> type = TREE_TYPE (decl) = do_auto_deduction (type, d_init, auto_node,
> tf_warning_or_error, adc,
> - outer_targs, flags);
> + outer_targs);
> if (type == error_mark_node)
> return;
> if (TREE_CODE (type) == FUNCTION_TYPE)
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/init.cc b/gcc/cp/init.cc
> index 545d904c0f9..d5faa0dc519 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/init.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/init.cc
> @@ -2019,11 +2019,7 @@ build_aggr_init (tree exp, tree init, int flags, tsubst_flags_t complain)
> return stmt_expr;
> }
>
> - if (init && init != void_type_node
> - && TREE_CODE (init) != TREE_LIST
> - && !(TREE_CODE (init) == TARGET_EXPR
> - && TARGET_EXPR_DIRECT_INIT_P (init))
> - && !DIRECT_LIST_INIT_P (init))
> + if (is_copy_initialization (init))
> flags |= LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING;
>
> is_global = begin_init_stmts (&stmt_expr, &compound_stmt);
> @@ -2331,6 +2327,20 @@ is_class_type (tree type, int or_else)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +/* Returns true iff the variable initializer INIT represents
> + copy-initialization (and therefore we must set LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING
> + when processing it). */
> +
> +bool
> +is_copy_initialization (tree init)
> +{
> + return (init && init != void_type_node
> + && TREE_CODE (init) != TREE_LIST
> + && !(TREE_CODE (init) == TARGET_EXPR
> + && TARGET_EXPR_DIRECT_INIT_P (init))
> + && !DIRECT_LIST_INIT_P (init));
> +}
> +
> /* Build a reference to a member of an aggregate. This is not a C++
> `&', but really something which can have its address taken, and
> then act as a pointer to member, for example TYPE :: FIELD can have
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> index d94d4538faa..a3ff81e2c3a 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> @@ -8567,8 +8567,7 @@ convert_template_argument (tree parm,
> can happen in the context of -fnew-ttp-matching. */;
> else if (tree a = type_uses_auto (t))
> {
> - t = do_auto_deduction (t, arg, a, complain, adc_unify, args,
> - LOOKUP_IMPLICIT);
> + t = do_auto_deduction (t, arg, a, complain, adc_unify, args);
> if (t == error_mark_node)
> return error_mark_node;
> }
> @@ -18606,7 +18605,11 @@ tsubst_expr (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t complain, tree in_decl,
> TREE_TYPE (asmspec_tree) = char_array_type_node;
> }
>
> - cp_finish_decl (decl, init, const_init, asmspec_tree, 0);
> +
> + int flags = LOOKUP_NORMAL;
> + if (VAR_P (decl) && is_copy_initialization (init))
> + flags |= LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING;
> + cp_finish_decl (decl, init, const_init, asmspec_tree, flags);
>
> if (ndecl != error_mark_node)
> cp_finish_decomp (ndecl, first, cnt);
> @@ -29832,8 +29835,7 @@ ctad_template_p (tree tmpl)
> type. */
>
> static tree
> -do_class_deduction (tree ptype, tree tmpl, tree init,
> - int flags, tsubst_flags_t complain)
> +do_class_deduction (tree ptype, tree tmpl, tree init, tsubst_flags_t complain)
> {
> /* We should have handled this in the caller. */
> if (DECL_TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM_P (tmpl))
> @@ -29885,6 +29887,7 @@ do_class_deduction (tree ptype, tree tmpl, tree init,
>
> bool try_list_ctor = false;
> bool list_init_p = false;
> + bool copy_init_p = is_copy_initialization (init);
>
> releasing_vec rv_args = NULL;
> vec<tree,va_gc> *&args = *&rv_args;
> @@ -29929,7 +29932,7 @@ do_class_deduction (tree ptype, tree tmpl, tree init,
> /* Prune explicit deduction guides in copy-initialization context (but
> not copy-list-initialization). */
> bool elided = false;
> - if (!list_init_p && (flags & LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING))
> + if (!list_init_p && copy_init_p)
> {
> for (lkp_iterator iter (cands); !elided && iter; ++iter)
> if (DECL_NONCONVERTING_P (STRIP_TEMPLATE (*iter)))
> @@ -30007,7 +30010,7 @@ do_class_deduction (tree ptype, tree tmpl, tree init,
> }
> /* [over.match.list]/1: In copy-list-initialization, if an explicit
> constructor is chosen, the initialization is ill-formed. */
> - else if (flags & LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING)
> + else if (copy_init_p)
> {
> if (DECL_NONCONVERTING_P (fndecl))
> {
> @@ -30045,7 +30048,7 @@ do_class_deduction (tree ptype, tree tmpl, tree init,
> /* Replace occurrences of 'auto' in TYPE with the appropriate type deduced
> from INIT. AUTO_NODE is the TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM used for 'auto' in TYPE.
> The CONTEXT determines the context in which auto deduction is performed
> - and is used to control error diagnostics. FLAGS are the LOOKUP_* flags.
> + and is used to control error diagnostics.
>
> OUTER_TARGS is used during template argument deduction (context == adc_unify)
> to properly substitute the result. It's also used in the adc_unify and
> @@ -30058,7 +30061,7 @@ do_class_deduction (tree ptype, tree tmpl, tree init,
> tree
> do_auto_deduction (tree type, tree init, tree auto_node,
> tsubst_flags_t complain, auto_deduction_context context,
> - tree outer_targs, int flags)
> + tree outer_targs)
> {
> if (init == error_mark_node)
> return error_mark_node;
> @@ -30079,7 +30082,7 @@ do_auto_deduction (tree type, tree init, tree auto_node,
>
> if (tree tmpl = CLASS_PLACEHOLDER_TEMPLATE (auto_node))
> /* C++17 class template argument deduction. */
> - return do_class_deduction (type, tmpl, init, flags, complain);
> + return do_class_deduction (type, tmpl, init, complain);
>
> if (init == NULL_TREE || TREE_TYPE (init) == NULL_TREE)
> /* Nothing we can do with this, even in deduction context. */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/explicit15.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/explicit15.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..f6c584d5f88
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/explicit15.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> +// PR c++/87820
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +
> +struct A {
> + explicit operator int();
> +};
> +
> +template<class T>
> +void f() {
> + A a;
> + T t1 = a; // { dg-error "cannot convert" }
> + T t2 = {a}; // { dg-error "cannot convert" }
> + T t3(a);
> + T t4{a};
> + T t5 = T(a);
> + T t6 = T{a};
> +}
> +
> +template<class T>
> +void g() {
> + T t;
> + int n1 = t; // { dg-error "cannot convert" }
> + int n2 = {t}; // { dg-error "cannot convert" }
> + int n3(t);
> + int n4{t};
> + int n5 = int(t);
> + int n6 = int{t};
> +}
> +
> +template void f<int>();
> +template void g<A>();
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction108.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction108.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..9e36c53c1a4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction108.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> +// PR c++/102137
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
> +
> +template<class T>
> +struct A {
> + A();
> + A(int);
> +};
> +
> +explicit A(...) -> A<int>;
> +
> +template<template<class> class T>
> +void f() {
> + T x1 = 0; // { dg-error "deduction|no match" }
> + T x2 = {0}; // { dg-error "explicit deduction guide" }
> + T x3(0);
> + T x4{0};
> + T x5;
> +}
> +
> +template<class T>
> +void g(T t) {
> + A a1 = t; // { dg-error "deduction|no match" }
> + A a2 = {t}; // { dg-error "explicit deduction guide" }
> + A a3(t);
> + A a4{t};
> + A a5;
> +}
> +
> +template void f<A>();
> +template void g(int);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-07 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-04 18:24 Patrick Palka
2022-03-04 22:34 ` Jason Merrill
2022-03-07 14:47 ` Patrick Palka
2022-03-07 19:14 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2022-03-08 15:36 ` Patrick Palka
2022-03-08 16:24 ` Jason Merrill
2022-03-08 18:38 ` Patrick Palka
2022-03-08 20:07 ` Jason Merrill
2022-03-08 21:17 ` Patrick Palka
2022-03-08 22:26 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b0af0762-ea88-57f3-8ffc-d5abc036700c@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ppalka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).