From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17033 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2017 13:20:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16983 invoked by uid 89); 19 Dec 2017 13:20:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=HContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit X-HELO: mx2.suse.de Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:20:45 +0000 Received: from relay1.suse.de (charybdis-ext.suse.de [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E287AABED; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Replying to an older patch ([PATCH] Fix failing test-case) To: Sudakshina Das , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Cc: nd , hubika@ucw.cz References: <9ae1eb49-a759-8c7e-f8fd-01e5d0f245e0@suse.cz> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:20:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-12/txt/msg01251.txt.bz2 On 12/19/2017 02:03 PM, Sudakshina Das wrote: > Hi Martin > > On 19/12/17 10:49, Martin Liška wrote: >> On 11/30/2017 12:03 PM, Sudakshina Das wrote: >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-10/msg01157.html >>> >>> This patch fixed a test case switch-case-2.c. I am seeing switch-case-1.c failing on >>> >>> arm-none-linux-gnueabihf: >>> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/switch-case-1.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand ";; basic block[^\\n]*count 2000" 1 (found 0 times) >>> >>> aarch64-none-linux-gnu: >>> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/switch-case-1.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand ";; basic block[^\\n]*count 2000" 1 (found 2 times) >>> >>> which looks pretty similar (also the same changes make it pass). Can you confirm? >>> >>> Sudi >> >> Hello. >> >> There's patch for that. Can you please test it? >> > > I have tested these changes and the test case passes for both arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and aarch64-none-linux-gnu. Good, thanks for testing. It's quite obvious patch and I'm going to install it. Martin > > Thanks > Sudi > >> Martin >> >