public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lulu Cheng <chenglulu@loongson.cn>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>, Levy <admin@levyhsu.com>
Cc: Liwei Xu <liwei.xu@intel.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, wilson@tuliptree.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimize nested permutation to single VEC_PERM_EXPR [PR54346]
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2022 16:15:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1f7a658-d330-9661-376a-3927434490d9@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26e1323e4a0395fbd1bc71b8f7a3f016fa6df54b.camel@xry111.site>


在 2022/10/13 下午2:44, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
> On Thu, 2022-10-13 at 14:15 +0800, Levy wrote:
>> Hi RuoYao
>>
>> It’s probably because loongarch64 doesn’t support
>> can_vec_perm_const_p(result_mode, op_mode, sel2, false)
>>
>> I’m not sure whether if loongarch will support it or should I just
>> limit the test target for pr54346.c?
> I'm not sure if we can add TARGET_VECTORIZE_VEC_PERM_CONST when we don't
> actually support vector.  (LoongArch has SIMD instructions but the
> support in GCC won't be added in a very recent future.)
>
If what I understand is correct, I think this might be a better solution.

  /* { dg-do compile } */

+/* { dg-require-effective-target vect_perm } */
  /* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-dse1" } */


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-13  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-26  6:56 Liwei Xu
2022-09-26  8:21 ` Richard Biener
2022-09-30  9:17   ` Richard Sandiford
2022-09-30  9:36     ` Xu, Liwei
2022-10-12 13:51 ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-10-13  6:15   ` Levy
2022-10-13  6:44     ` Xi Ruoyao
2022-10-13  8:15       ` Lulu Cheng [this message]
2022-10-13 11:10         ` Richard Biener
2022-10-14  1:09           ` Xu, Liwei
2022-10-14  1:49           ` Lulu Cheng
2022-10-14  6:18             ` Richard Biener
2022-10-14  6:34               ` Xu, Liwei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b1f7a658-d330-9661-376a-3927434490d9@loongson.cn \
    --to=chenglulu@loongson.cn \
    --cc=admin@levyhsu.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=liwei.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=wilson@tuliptree.org \
    --cc=xry111@xry111.site \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).