From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 111899 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2017 11:51:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 111866 invoked by uid 89); 25 Apr 2017 11:51:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPAM_BODY,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:458, H*i:sk:tkrat.b, H*f:sk:tkrat.b, H*MI:sk:tkrat.b X-HELO: mail-yw0-f179.google.com Received: from mail-yw0-f179.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f179.google.com) (209.85.161.179) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:51:52 +0000 Received: by mail-yw0-f179.google.com with SMTP id k11so47637793ywb.1 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:51:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Tr4jM1cyPRH2Mp9eo3r1Txdyf30ac7qh7vZu9BsVeiM=; b=Ew0Pv3JMROkal4kpGBsMF/k29xD+IsRi5Hg4OmNpCBtzxDHmbfXX9NvQzs4Qf/cGBV 4da63oqEf10XyGp493ZFZo8c2Qk+UnAr2PohyQuE4z5TDJKekQKreP6tLdWGt/BkmzqH l2utuUBTvobhfRy1nVwgAVtTTPY8JZZ4FaPykAnX4iAE7ttNIg/0iRMvF6C1N/8tpk5X hFZx5y/SkI8NnnGRQ7oK4LYfybhj1anP3tL5zejVZGPcBRPNdxH8wVfhzQTZakEuJ2aN KoSkFjW2W7FBJattRFmV63Bt49LWmBeBFVy01hbJ2LUIDMIT4p2XoSfN2bmqELPUmZHj c1Tw== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7NLjDRlsdzyQxFnBn2U6j++GmVWiprZpy8+sEMhN0+rgUtRVz3 JOETigaEdbwwNw== X-Received: by 10.13.232.10 with SMTP id r10mr9492537ywe.145.1493121113261; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:51:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2620:10d:c0a3:20fb:f6d0:5ac5:64cd:f102? ([2620:10d:c091:200::2:8903]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n68sm8473132ywn.30.2017.04.25.04.51.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH, C++] Fix-it info for invalid class/struct after enum To: Volker Reichelt , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: David Malcolm References: From: Nathan Sidwell Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 12:07:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-04/txt/msg01172.txt.bz2 On 04/25/2017 03:39 AM, Volker Reichelt wrote: > Hi, > > the following patch adds fix-it information for a pedwarn in the C++ > parser about the invalid use of class/struct after enum. > > 2017-04-25 Volker Reichelt > > * parser.c (cp_parser_elaborated_type_specifier): Add fix-it to > diagnostic of invalid class/struct keyword after enum. ok -- Nathan Sidwell