On 3/30/23 09:41, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 01:22:27PM -0400, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>> however, as seems to be the case often, better ranges result in, I now get:
>>
>> FAIL: 23_containers/vector/bool/allocator/copy.cc (test for excess errors)
> Our middle-end warnings are just badly designed :(, the better value ranges
> are, the more false positives they have.
>
>> commit 358d0ca44faf2e20fbacd0f74386308b5ca52cd4
>> Author: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>
>> Date:   Tue Mar 28 12:16:34 2023 -0400
>>
>>      Add recursive GORI recompuations with a depth limit.
> LGTM for trunk, let's do with the regression incrementally.
> Or as Richard mentioned on IRC, one possibility would be to force this
> param temporarily to 1 (or whatever matches previous behavior) for the
> diagnostic range queries).
>
> You need a ChangeLog entry though...
>
Attached. I also removed the bogus warning in Walloc-13.c that no longer 
happens

So incrementally deal with it.. what? just let it fail?

Andrew