Re: [PATCH] arm: fix c23 0-named-args caller-side stdarg

["Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>]

On 06/03/2024 20:28, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar  1, 2024, "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 01/03/2024 04:38, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> Thanks for the review.
> 
>> For closure, Jakub has just pushed a patch to the generic code, so I
>> don't think we need this now.
> 
> ACK.  I see the c2x-stdarg-4.c test is now passing in our arm-eabi
> gcc-13 tree.  Thank you all.
> 
> Alas, the same nightly build showed a new riscv fail in c23-stdarg-6.c,
> that also got backported to gcc-13.  Presumably it's failing in the
> trunk as well, both riscv32-elf and riscv64-elf.
> 
> I haven't looked into whether it's a regression brought about by the
> patch or just a new failure mode that the new test exposed.  Either way,
> I'm not sure whether to link this new failure to any of the associated
> PRs or to file a new one, but, FTR, I'm going to look into it.
> 

I'd suggest a new pr.  It's easier to track than re-opening an existing on.

R.

> -- 
> Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker            https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ <https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/>
>    Free Software Activist                   GNU Toolchain Engineer
> More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity
> Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive