From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: "Andre Vieira (lists)" <Andre.SimoesDiasVieira@arm.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR78255: Make postreload aware of NO_FUNCTION_CSE
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 15:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b47bfbc0-7a39-b72c-c6ef-a7e69729b383@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <586F772B.50209@arm.com>
On 01/06/2017 03:53 AM, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> On 09/12/16 16:31, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> On 12/09/2016 05:16 PM, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>>
>>> Regardless, 'reload_cse_simplify' would never perform the opposite
>>> transformation. It checks whether it can replace anything within the
>>> first argument INSN, with the second argument TESTREG. As the name
>>> implies this will always be a register. I double checked, the function
>>> is only called in 'reload_cse_regs' and 'testreg' is created using
>>> 'gen_rtx_REG'.
>>
>> Ok, let's go ahead with it.
>>
>>
>> Bernd
>>
> Hello,
>
> Is it OK to backport this (including the testcase fix) to gcc-6-branch?
>
> Patches apply cleanly and full bootstrap and regression tests for
> aarch64- and arm-none-linux-gnueabihf. Regression tested for arm-none-eabi.
Yes, that should be fine to backport to the active release branches.
jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-06 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-09 14:03 Andre Vieira (lists)
2016-12-09 15:02 ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-12-09 15:34 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2016-12-09 15:58 ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-12-09 16:02 ` Ramana Radhakrishnan
2016-12-09 16:16 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2016-12-09 16:31 ` Bernd Schmidt
2016-12-09 17:22 ` [arm-embedded][committed] " Andre Vieira (lists)
2017-01-06 10:53 ` [PATCH] " Andre Vieira (lists)
2017-01-06 15:47 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2017-01-11 15:09 ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2016-12-12 9:05 ` Christophe Lyon
2016-12-20 16:48 ` [ARM][committed] Fix for PR78255-2.c testism for targets that do not optimize for tailcall Andre Vieira (lists)
2016-12-09 16:01 ` [PATCH] PR78255: Make postreload aware of NO_FUNCTION_CSE Jeff Law
2016-12-09 15:47 Wilco Dijkstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b47bfbc0-7a39-b72c-c6ef-a7e69729b383@redhat.com \
--to=law@redhat.com \
--cc=Andre.SimoesDiasVieira@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).