From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 43366 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2017 11:22:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 43346 invoked by uid 89); 9 Mar 2017 11:22:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:745 X-HELO: foss.arm.com Received: from foss.arm.com (HELO foss.arm.com) (217.140.101.70) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 11:22:16 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF0E14F6; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 03:22:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.2.206.52] (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 981993F3E1; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 03:22:14 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] gcc-8/porting_to.html To: Jakub Jelinek References: <7aaf616d-2e0a-cf68-3e4b-0c48b6e16d00@foss.arm.com> <97780aa1-62c2-9471-a9f7-fce968f94fe3@gmail.com> <20845b34-f951-f2d1-0365-b8c8e788be5b@foss.arm.com> <20170309105854.GG22703@tucnak> Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , JonY <10walls@gmail.com>, NightStrike , GCC Patches From: Thomas Preudhomme Message-ID: Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 11:22:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170309105854.GG22703@tucnak> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00419.txt.bz2 Hi Jakub, I forgot to mention "ok for stage1?", my bad. JonY said he was queuing the corresponding changes in GCC for stage1 so I was just trying to have a complete story. I do not expect to commit this before the actual code change is committed. Best regards, Thomas On 09/03/17 10:58, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:51:27AM +0000, Thomas Preudhomme wrote: >> Thanks Gerald, >> >> JonY: what about the attached patch to document the change of behavior of >> GCC on Windows depending on the configure option used? > > GCC 7 has not branched yet, so the change can't be committed anywhere. > It seems documenting something before it is actually changed is just too > weird. > > Jakub >