public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Scheiner <frank.scheiner@web.de>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Rene Rebe <rene@exactcode.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Enabled LRA for ia64.
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 22:59:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b52e5d8a-14e4-455f-82fd-a8488faa44e6@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zmnuzmz4PrAIdKBS@zen.kayari.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1861 bytes --]

Hi Jonathan, Richard,

On 12.06.24 20:54, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 12/06/24 16:09 +0200, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>> Dear Richard,
>>
>> On 12.06.24 13:01, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I can find two gcc-testresult postings, one appearantly with LRA
>>> and one without?  Both from May:
>>>
>>> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-May/816422.html
>>> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-May/816346.html
>>>
>>> somehow for example libstdc++ summaries were not merged, it might
>>> be you do not have recent python installed on the system?  Or you
>>> didn't use contrib/test_summary to create those mails.
>>
>> No, I did not use contrib/test_summary. But I still have tarballs of
>> both testsuite runs, so could still produce these summaries - I hope?
> 
> It looks like the results at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-May/816422.html are
> just what's printed on standard out, including output from 'make -j4'
> so not combined into one set of results.

That's what it is, yes.

> It would certainly be better to either get the results from the .sum
> files, or just use the contrib/test_summary script to do that for you.

Ok, I posted the results as created by contrib/test_summary now:

1. non-LRA version on [1]

2. LRA version on [2]

[1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-June/817267.html

[2]: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-June/817268.html

The difference 2 compared to 1 is attached.

>> Do I need to run this on the host that did the testing or can I run it
>> on my NFS server where the tarballs are actually located, too?
> 
> I don't think the script cares where it's run, it just looks at text
> files which should work on any host.

It looks like it worked fine. :-)

Cheers,
Frank
  

[-- Attachment #2: gcc-15-lra-to-non-lra-testsute-summary.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 6196 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc-15-testsuite-summary.log b/gcc-15-lra-testsuite-summary.log
index b7acc04..558079a 100644
--- a/gcc-15-testsuite-summary.log
+++ b/gcc-15-lra-testsuite-summary.log
@@ -306,13 +306,12 @@ FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/csttest.c  -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  line 55 q == -(0x1ef
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/csttest.c  -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  line 55 r == -(0x1efULL << 50)
 XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c   -O0  execution test
 XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c   -O0  execution test
-XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c   -O3 -g  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c   -O1  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c   -O2  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
+FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c   -O3 -g  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c   -Os  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params-2.c  -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c   -O1  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
-XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c   -O3 -g  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c  -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/ipa-sra-1.c   -O1  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  line 19 k == 3
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/ipa-sra-1.c   -O1  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  line 31 k == 3
@@ -434,6 +433,7 @@ FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c   -Os  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c  -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O1  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O2  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
+FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c   -O3 -g  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41616-1.c  -Og -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  execution test
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43051-1.c   -Os  -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION  line 34 c == &a[0]
 FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43077-1.c   -O0  line 19 vara == 1
@@ -798,10 +798,10 @@ FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c compilation,  -fprofile-genera
 UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c compilation,  -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
 UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c execution,    -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE
 UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/crossmodule-indircall-1a.c execution,    -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
-FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr77698.c compilation,  -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE
-UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr77698.c compilation,  -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
-UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr77698.c execution,    -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE
-UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr77698.c execution,    -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
+FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr47187.c compilation,  -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr47187.c compilation,  -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr47187.c execution,    -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE
+UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr47187.c execution,    -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/abs-4.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "= -" 3
 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/abs-4.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "= ABS_EXPR" 3
 FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/asm-2.c (test for excess errors)
@@ -953,18 +953,21 @@ FAIL: gcc.target/ia64/pr49303.c (test for excess errors)
 
 		=== gcc Summary ===
 
-# of expected passes		134719
-# of unexpected failures	899
-# of unexpected successes	21
-# of expected failures		1362
+# of expected passes		134769
+# of unexpected failures	901
+# of unexpected successes	19
+# of expected failures		1364
 # of unresolved testcases	23
-# of unsupported tests		3081
-/dev/shm/gcc-15/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.112623.549077/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/xgcc  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
+# of unsupported tests		3036
+/dev/shm/gcc-15-lra/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.123346.921189/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/xgcc  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
 
 		=== gfortran tests ===
 
 
 Running target unix
+FAIL: gfortran.dg/default_initialization_3.f90   -O3 -g  (internal compiler error: in create_block_for_bookkeeping, at sel-sched.cc:4557)
+FAIL: gfortran.dg/default_initialization_3.f90   -O3 -g  (test for excess errors)
+UNRESOLVED: gfortran.dg/default_initialization_3.f90   -O3 -g  compilation failed to produce executable
 FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90   -O   (test for errors, line 6)
 FAIL: gfortran.dg/pr95690.f90   -O  (test for excess errors)
 FAIL: gfortran.dg/guality/arg1.f90   -O1  line 14 a(10) == 10
@@ -978,11 +981,12 @@ FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-2.f90   -O   scan-tree-dump-times vect "Alignment of
 
 		=== gfortran Summary ===
 
-# of expected passes		69618
-# of unexpected failures	10
+# of expected passes		69616
+# of unexpected failures	12
 # of expected failures		273
+# of unresolved testcases	1
 # of unsupported tests		168
-/dev/shm/gcc-15/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.112623.549077/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/gfortran  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
+/dev/shm/gcc-15-lra/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.123346.921189/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/gfortran  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
 
 		=== g++ tests ===
 
@@ -1201,7 +1205,7 @@ FAIL: g++.dg/tree-prof/pr35545.C scan-tree-dump-not optimized "OBJ_TYPE_REF"
 # of expected failures		2595
 # of unresolved testcases	5
 # of unsupported tests		11542
-/dev/shm/gcc-15/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.112623.549077/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/xg++  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
+/dev/shm/gcc-15-lra/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.123346.921189/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/xg++  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
 
 		=== objc tests ===
 
@@ -1212,7 +1216,7 @@ Running target unix
 
 # of expected passes		2778
 # of unsupported tests		58
-/dev/shm/gcc-15/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.112623.549077/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/xgcc  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
+/dev/shm/gcc-15-lra/src.gcc.ia64-toolchain-3.240529.123346.921189/gcc/gcc.build.lnx/gcc/xgcc  version 15.0.0 20240528 (experimental) (GCC) 
 
 		=== libatomic tests ===
 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-12 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <45833A6D-A84C-4276-AADB-BE2923886F64@exactcode.de>
     [not found] ` <A935D68A-1B29-421A-A239-52CA50ADA239@suse.de>
     [not found]   ` <3DAB006A-ACE2-4BEC-AA01-87625DBEE259@exactcode.de>
2024-06-12 10:33     ` [PATCH 0/3] Remove ia64*-*-linux from the list of obsolete targets Rene Rebe
2024-06-12 10:42       ` [PATCH 1/3] " Rene Rebe
2024-06-12 18:40         ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-06-12 18:48           ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-06-13  8:58         ` Gerald Pfeifer
2024-06-12 10:42       ` [PATCH 2/3] Enabled LRA for ia64 Rene Rebe
2024-06-12 11:01         ` Richard Biener
2024-06-12 12:50           ` René Rebe
2024-06-12 13:00             ` Richard Biener
2024-06-12 13:19               ` René Rebe
2024-06-12 14:03                 ` Frank Scheiner
2024-06-12 14:09           ` Frank Scheiner
2024-06-12 18:54             ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-06-12 20:59               ` Frank Scheiner [this message]
2024-06-13 10:33                 ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-06-13 14:11                   ` Jeff Law
2024-06-13 14:16                     ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-06-13 14:18                       ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-06-14 11:07                   ` Frank Scheiner
2024-06-14 12:53                     ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-06-14 13:07                       ` Frank Scheiner
2024-06-14 13:23                         ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-06-17 18:03                           ` Joseph Myers
2024-06-17 18:53                             ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-06-17 19:36                               ` Frank Scheiner
2024-06-13  7:02             ` Richard Biener
2024-06-12 10:43       ` [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as IA-64 maintainer Rene Rebe
2024-06-12 19:03         ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-06-12 18:44       ` [PATCH 0/3] Remove ia64*-*-linux from the list of obsolete targets Jonathan Wakely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b52e5d8a-14e4-455f-82fd-a8488faa44e6@web.de \
    --to=frank.scheiner@web.de \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=rene@exactcode.de \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).