From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: jose.marchesi@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] select .rodata for const volatile variables.
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 11:06:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b54fb524-336e-44b7-2092-abe9f82258fc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221202175225.2780-2-cupertino.miranda@oracle.com>
On 12/2/22 10:52, Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Changed target code to select .rodata section for 'const volatile'
> defined variables.
> This change is in the context of the bugzilla #170181.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> v850.c(v850_select_section): Changed function.
I'm not sure this is safe/correct. ISTM that you need to look at the
underlying TREE_TYPE to check for const-volatile rather than
TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS.
Of secondary importance is the ChangeLog. Just saying "Changed
function" provides no real information. Something like this would be
better:
* config/v850/v850.c (v850_select_section): Put const volatile
objects into read-only sections.
Jeff
> ---
> gcc/config/v850/v850.cc | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/v850/v850.cc b/gcc/config/v850/v850.cc
> index c7d432990ab..e66893fede4 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/v850/v850.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/v850/v850.cc
> @@ -2865,7 +2865,6 @@ v850_select_section (tree exp,
> {
> int is_const;
> if (!TREE_READONLY (exp)
> - || TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (exp)
> || !DECL_INITIAL (exp)
> || (DECL_INITIAL (exp) != error_mark_node
> && !TREE_CONSTANT (DECL_INITIAL (exp))))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-05 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-02 17:52 [PATCH] `const volatile' sections selection - bugzilla #107181 Cupertino Miranda
2022-12-02 17:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] select .rodata for const volatile variables Cupertino Miranda
2022-12-05 18:06 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2022-12-07 15:12 ` Cupertino Miranda
2022-12-15 10:13 ` Cupertino Miranda
2022-12-22 17:21 ` [PING] " Cupertino Miranda
2023-01-02 10:42 ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-01-09 7:57 ` Richard Biener
2023-01-13 15:06 ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-01-19 9:59 ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-01-22 18:43 ` Jeff Law
2023-01-22 18:49 ` Jeff Law
2022-12-02 17:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] Corrected pr25521.c target matching Cupertino Miranda
2022-12-05 18:47 ` Jeff Law
2022-12-07 15:45 ` Cupertino Miranda
2022-12-15 10:14 ` Cupertino Miranda
2022-12-22 17:22 ` [PING] " Cupertino Miranda
2023-01-02 10:43 ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-01-13 15:13 ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-01-22 19:04 ` Jeff Law
2023-01-24 12:24 ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-01-31 9:10 ` [PING] " Cupertino Miranda
2023-02-07 9:53 ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-02-17 14:33 ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-02-27 10:17 ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-03-09 9:51 ` [PING, PING] " Cupertino Miranda
2023-03-11 16:25 ` Jeff Law
2023-03-13 17:52 ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-03-13 17:57 ` Cupertino Miranda
2023-04-03 4:16 ` Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b54fb524-336e-44b7-2092-abe9f82258fc@gmail.com \
--to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=cupertino.miranda@oracle.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).