From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6287D385840F for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 07:32:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 6287D385840F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=emailplus.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=emailplus.org Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398005C0100; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 02:32:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 24 Feb 2023 02:32:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emailplus.org; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from :from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1677223948; x= 1677310348; bh=TJ9h695DoYqc89ulx6svFFBLIE3g/M7tpojj86VsP3s=; b=2 SOeeFLQPrKTgkvPlrc62F46pjjlZbQy9ILu2XqwBcdqHCId6DlVSJFLwhhTcbSiT NiZOntXrXOVigGEs/DObVHtJBdrNPpsxioJ1sschnwuciguY8tZxt4TxHNiO7S4E uqwnWAa7U4PTJLGoKVaYyjfBPFVfxLu6gLuX6TIduC41JW8/SjYCOVlAFHkW8Xpj +0J2tAcGGBhxsqQQKFyMWT4xuLgNlnxrj7hclYuNnd2D5Y8sS6IUwRqP/abbeJtV FDwN0saqsGLYJ9/D4XSe0XF5Il0IvsCOOYeUx6cfN3Y3idf/y10hBU9RuBMoo+JH FUkAgyyzg5p/BNbt+CJ5Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1677223948; x= 1677310348; bh=TJ9h695DoYqc89ulx6svFFBLIE3g/M7tpojj86VsP3s=; b=B VqeTZfYPxhYA8ntNPTAxS024+aNOmEdkN5ZZGLrWYyyHVmLyD6bLNe4Q37EAh+uB HMesBzNVowTH1841wGahkpUknETxp+usIDtkU3qw3PInPooPuXicsd5AeFhV64im 4Tfg6SbKsX2lyTIFgZNSBrtDlCBgfRzKuPHDLbEYILeGjWWPcm/7b3AIMryKcd+x gfljarBYXQDs068aoIl71wcj0k6NXDHB0BH4+vcMCf+HUmLwbLunxjTBZJoATfde LA1Iq3cEEXc5ymywGonArAVUPD7QlgOgD6QyJAJ2MT2QUUVLIsGT12wiC35sABkk 5WYf+CJXS77klKwJO++1w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrudekvddguddtgecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfevfhfhjggtgfesthejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepuegv nhhsohhnucfouhhithgvuceosggvnhhsohhnpghmuhhithgvsegvmhgrihhlphhluhhsrd horhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvjefhgeejgfejueevvdfhleevieeuudejlefg tddttdehgeevledtueduieetfeenucffohhmrghinhepfiefrdhorhhgpdhhthhmlhdqvh grlhhiuggrthgvrdhorhhgpdhgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv pedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsvghnshhonhgpmhhuihhtvgesvghmrg hilhhplhhushdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ic1e8415a:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 24 Feb 2023 02:32:25 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 10:32:19 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Subject: Re: [wwwdocs, patch] OpenMP update for gcc-13/changes.html + projects/gomp/ Content-Language: en-US To: Gerald Pfeifer , Tobias Burnus Cc: gcc-patches , Jakub Jelinek References: <2ea49ef0-4885-f00a-e883-90a01db5aad9@pfeifer.com> <34b4c8eb-83a3-1a5a-f774-0076e2e8f580@codesourcery.com> From: Benson Muite In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 2/24/23 04:02, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023, Tobias Burnus wrote: >> PS: I also removed a stray , but admittedly only after the >> commit. I found it by manually running those through the w3 validator >> site. However, I did not see an automatic email, either it takes longer >> or does it no longer run? It did in the past! > > You are right, and this is a sore / sad point: validator.w3.org that we > used in the past now only supports interactive sessions. And they even > broke support for the Referer header, so I also had to remove the checking > link I had embedded in all of our pages. > > These days I invoke the validator (via a version of the original script) > when I see a commit. Which indeed leads to many orders of magnitude longer > delays. > > Sadly I don't have a better alternative. :-( > Could one of the following be used or used to generate a better workflow: https://html-validate.org/usage/cli.html - written in Javascript, but has a command line interface https://github.com/validator/validator - packaged, but a little cumbersome, may need a wrapper https://github.com/w3c-validators/w3c_validators - Wrapper written in Ruby, with a nice interface to validate a local file