From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21014 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2016 18:42:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20928 invoked by uid 89); 11 Aug 2016 18:42:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=namely X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 18:42:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8BDB5CD; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 18:42:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-116-202.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.202]) by int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u7BIg8FS015256; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 14:42:08 -0400 Subject: Re: Early jump threading To: Richard Biener , Jan Hubicka References: <20160811140235.GA68714@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20160811142700.GA57561@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <9B0D3D88-1653-4CB6-89BB-948064048D8F@suse.de> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: Jeff Law Message-ID: Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 18:42:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9B0D3D88-1653-4CB6-89BB-948064048D8F@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-08/txt/msg00956.txt.bz2 On 08/11/2016 09:50 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > Ah, I thought it was exclusively dealing with threading through back > edges which is sth I'd avoid doing early? No, that's one of the fundamental changes we made for gcc-6, namely using the FSM threader for general purpose threading rather than just using it for threading across loop backedges. I've got a few things to do first, but the direction I want to go is to use the FSM threader exclusively. Jeff