From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 115788 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2019 09:16:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 115780 invoked by uid 89); 10 Sep 2019 09:16:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=H*M:online, HX-Languages-Length:321, H*r:sk:mailout, H*RU:sk:mailout X-HELO: mailout02.t-online.de Received: from mailout02.t-online.de (HELO mailout02.t-online.de) (194.25.134.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 09:16:43 +0000 Received: from fwd08.aul.t-online.de (fwd08.aul.t-online.de [172.20.26.151]) by mailout02.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 57C6C41F72B4; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:16:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from yam-desktop (r2Ny78ZGwhieq-RHuO-dLBtqDuYi01UbcJsGtSrduB2Y2EsEzlPnDEIlViSMy0Jw9z@[163.58.16.102]) by fwd08.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1i7cGN-1BtCnQ0; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:16:39 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [1/9] Simplify the implementation of HARD_REG_SET From: Oleg Endo To: Richard Sandiford , Jeff Law Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 09:16:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: <15887a75-8c04-892d-6054-a7782f13350f@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00644.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2019-09-09 at 19:05 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Yeah. I might come back to this later and look at a fuller > transition > to C++ (or at least to try to get rid of CLEAR_HARD_REG_SET). > Maybe you can just typedef it to std::bitset ;) Cheers, Oleg