From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-443388-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28886 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2016 21:35:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28877 invoked by uid 89); 2 Dec 2016 21:35:05 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=speak, hides, raised, relay
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 21:35:04 +0000
Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27])	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F16E37AE81;	Fri,  2 Dec 2016 21:35:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-116-36.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.116.36])	by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uB2LZ1oC030020;	Fri, 2 Dec 2016 16:35:02 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR78306
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,        Andrew Senkevich <andrew.n.senkevich@gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1611151556300.5294@t29.fhfr.qr> <7b587730-b3cc-6558-f53a-06f53074de81@redhat.com> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1611290844280.5294@t29.fhfr.qr> <7e9c05f1-a4d6-2a79-7c03-0219c90cf134@redhat.com> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1611300946460.5294@t29.fhfr.qr> <CAMXFM3uf6tKkA3i5kFhyryam122THAeNm2_saPAfy1K+SYAZUQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1611301342350.5294@t29.fhfr.qr>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <b9f733fd-e641-912c-5a3a-f6ef7d02f9e2@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 21:35:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1611301342350.5294@t29.fhfr.qr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg00251.txt.bz2

On 11/30/2016 07:18 AM, Richard Biener wrote:

>
> so progess on the OMP front hides regressions elsewhere.  The patch
> that started this thread does not have any effect on the conformance
> testsuite result.
>
> That makes it even more obvious that it is a) unmaintained, b) probably
> not used widely as those ICEs have not been reported as bugs
>
> Let's deprecate Cilk+ if no maintainer steps up until 7.1 is released.
> Gerald, can you relay that to the SC?
I've raised the issue with the steering committee; I will also speak 
with Intel about the possibility of them providing resources to maintain 
this code.

jeff