From: Carl Love <cel@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
"bergner@linux.ibm.com" <bergner@linux.ibm.com>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/13] rs6000, remove the vec_xxsel built-ins, they are duplicates
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 13:19:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba4c7fba-986c-4d0a-96b3-0419bb4accd6@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2fcb73c-65a7-d295-67bb-1d7d97015c18@linux.ibm.com>
Kewen:
On 5/13/24 19:55, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on 2024/4/20 05:18, Carl Love wrote:
>> rs6000, remove the vec_xxsel built-ins, they are duplicates
<snip>
>> -int do_sel(void)
>> -{
>> - int i = 0;
>> -
>> - si[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_xxsel_4si (si[i][1], si[i][2], si[i][3]); i++;
^ changed to ui
>> - ss[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_xxsel_8hi (ss[i][1], ss[i][2], ss[i][3]); i++;
^ changed to ui
>> - sc[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_xxsel_16qi (sc[i][1], sc[i][2], sc[i][3]); i++;
^ changed to uc
>> - f[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_xxsel_4sf (f[i][1], f[i][2], f[i][3]); i++;
>> - d[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_xxsel_2df (d[i][1], d[i][2], d[i][3]); i++;
>> -
>> - si[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_xxsel (si[i][1], si[i][2], bi[i][3]); i++;
>> - ss[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_xxsel (ss[i][1], ss[i][2], bs[i][3]); i++;
>> - sc[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_xxsel (sc[i][1], sc[i][2], bc[i][3]); i++;
>> - f[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_xxsel (f[i][1], f[i][2], bi[i][3]); i++;
>> - d[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_xxsel (d[i][1], d[i][2], bl[i][3]); i++;
>> -
>> - si[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_xxsel (si[i][1], si[i][2], ui[i][3]); i++;
>> - ss[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_xxsel (ss[i][1], ss[i][2], us[i][3]); i++;
>> - sc[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_xxsel (sc[i][1], sc[i][2], uc[i][3]); i++;
>> - f[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_xxsel (f[i][1], f[i][2], ui[i][3]); i++;
>> - d[i][0] = __builtin_vsx_xxsel (d[i][1], d[i][2], ul[i][3]); i++;
>> -
>> - return i;
>> -}
>> -
>
> I prefer to keep them but just replacing the call with vec_sel.
>
> OK with the above nits tweaked, thanks.
OK, changed __builtin_vsx_xxsel_4si_* to vec_sel, changed__builtin_vsx_xxsel to vec_sel.
Had to add #include <altivec.h>.
Finally, changed the third argument for the first three calls, as noted above, to be compatible with the vec_sel built-in specification.
Carl
>
> BR,
> Kewen
>
>> int do_perm(void)
>> {
>> int i = 0;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-24 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 21:04 [PATCH 0/13] rs6000, built-in cleanup patch series Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:16 ` [PATCH 1/13] rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_cmple* builtins Carl Love
2024-05-13 6:28 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-04-19 21:17 ` [PATCH 2/13] rs6000, Remove __builtin_vsx_xvcvspsxws built-in Carl Love
2024-05-14 8:43 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:18 ` Carl Love
2024-05-27 1:43 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-04-19 21:17 ` [PATCH 3/13] rs6000, fix error in unsigned vector float to unsigned int built-in definitions Carl Love
2024-05-14 7:00 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:19 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:17 ` [PATCH 4/13] rs6000, extend the current vec_{un,}signed{e,o} built-ins Carl Love
2024-05-14 7:53 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-17 20:20 ` Carl Love
2024-05-20 1:10 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:19 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:17 ` [PATCH 5/13] rs6000, remove duplicated built-ins of vecmergl and vec_mergeh Carl Love
2024-05-14 2:06 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-04-19 21:17 ` [PATCH 6/13] rs6000, add overloaded vec_sel with int128 arguments Carl Love
2024-05-14 2:54 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-22 0:13 ` Carl Love
2024-05-22 3:05 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:19 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 7/13] rs6000, remove the vec_xxsel built-ins, they are duplicates Carl Love
2024-05-14 2:55 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:19 ` Carl Love [this message]
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 8/13] rs6000, remove __builtin_vsx_vperm_* built-ins Carl Love
2024-05-14 2:59 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:20 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 9/13] rs6000, remove __builtin_vsx_xvnegdp and __builtin_vsx_xvnegsp built-ins Carl Love
2024-05-14 3:01 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 10/13] rs6000, extend vec_xxpermdi built-in for __int128 args Carl Love
2024-05-14 5:14 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:20 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 11/13] rs6000, remove __builtin_vsx_xvcmpeqsp_p built-in Carl Love
2024-05-14 5:26 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 20:20 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 12/13] rs6000, remove __builtin_vsx_xvcmpeqsp built-in Carl Love
2024-05-14 5:37 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-23 18:21 ` Carl Love
2024-05-24 10:43 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-24 15:19 ` Carl Love
2024-04-19 21:18 ` [PATCH 13/13] rs6000, remove vector set and vector init built-ins Carl Love
2024-05-14 5:44 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-23 0:29 ` Carl Love
2024-05-23 2:27 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-05-10 15:15 ` [PING} Re: [PATCH 0/13] rs6000, built-in cleanup patch series Carl Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ba4c7fba-986c-4d0a-96b3-0419bb4accd6@linux.ibm.com \
--to=cel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).