public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ajit Agarwal <aagarwa1@linux.ibm.com>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtl-optimization: Modify loop live data with livein of loop header
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2023 15:15:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bec398ef-b3bb-4df8-999f-28a48f5ae7e8@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc2E4p=2Rvhezv2B7xRxe_3yQ-6DAtLQSONFuWRbqfAWwg@mail.gmail.com>



On 21/11/23 3:02 pm, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 9:30 AM Ajit Agarwal <aagarwa1@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello All:
>>
>> This patch marked LOOP_DATA->live as the livein at the loop header basic
>> block. This is because Livein at each basic block is live in at the loop header.
> 
> The current code does the same, you now have fewer regs live.  In fact
> your patch removes all of the settings since when
> loop->aux == NULL there's no LOOP_DATA (loop), so you never do anything.
> 

Sorry for the inconvenience caused. I forgot to remove the check loop-aux == NULL
in the patch that I sent.

My mistake. Sorry for that.

Thanks & Regards
Ajit
> It appears that you do not fully grasp the changes done by your
> patches - you need to improve
> in this regard and either provide better explanations or stop sending these kind
> of patches.
> 
> I will stop looking at your patches now, it appears to be a waste of
> my precious time.
> 
> Peter - please work with Ajit here.
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard.
> 
> 
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64-linux-gnu.
>>
>> SPEC CPU 2017 benchmarks score is better than trunk wit this
>> change for INT and FP benchmarks.
>>
>> THanks & Regards
>> Ajit
>>
>>
>> rtl-optimization: Modify loop live data with livein of loop header
>>
>> Livein at each basic block is live in at the loop header.
>> Marked LOOP_DATA->live as the livein at the loop header basic
>> block.
>>
>> 2023-11-21  Ajit Kumar Agarwal  <aagarwa1@linux.ibm.com>
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>>         * loop-invariant.cc (calculate_loop_reg_pressure): Mark
>>         LOOP_DATA->live as the livein at the loop header basic block.
>> ---
>>  gcc/loop-invariant.cc | 11 ++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/loop-invariant.cc b/gcc/loop-invariant.cc
>> index a9b156682bc..c15e6168d5d 100644
>> --- a/gcc/loop-invariant.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/loop-invariant.cc
>> @@ -2169,17 +2169,18 @@ calculate_loop_reg_pressure (void)
>>        }
>>    ira_setup_eliminable_regset ();
>>    bitmap_initialize (&curr_regs_live, &reg_obstack);
>> +
>> +  /* Livein (loop_hdr) is live at each of the loop basic blocks.  */
>> +  for (auto loop : loops_list (cfun, 0))
>> +    if (loop->aux == NULL)
>> +      bitmap_ior_into (&LOOP_DATA (loop)->regs_live, DF_LR_IN (loop->header));
>> +
>>    FOR_EACH_BB_FN (bb, cfun)
>>      {
>>        curr_loop = bb->loop_father;
>>        if (curr_loop == current_loops->tree_root)
>>         continue;
>>
>> -      for (class loop *loop = curr_loop;
>> -          loop != current_loops->tree_root;
>> -          loop = loop_outer (loop))
>> -       bitmap_ior_into (&LOOP_DATA (loop)->regs_live, DF_LR_IN (bb));
>> -
>>        bitmap_copy (&curr_regs_live, DF_LR_IN (bb));
>>        for (i = 0; i < ira_pressure_classes_num; i++)
>>         curr_reg_pressure[ira_pressure_classes[i]] = 0;
>> --
>> 2.39.3
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-21  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-21  8:30 Ajit Agarwal
2023-11-21  9:32 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-21  9:45   ` Ajit Agarwal [this message]
2023-11-21  9:52     ` Ajit Agarwal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bec398ef-b3bb-4df8-999f-28a48f5ae7e8@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=aagarwa1@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).