From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libcpp: Ignore CPP_PADDING tokens in _cpp_parse_expr [PR105732]
Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 15:54:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bee61ebc-c3f4-a010-eaa3-4d49bc3237fe@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YpCI0AIkjluhu+L8@tucnak>
On 5/27/22 04:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The first part of the following testcase (m1-m3 macros and its use)
> regressed with my PR89971 fix, but as the m1,m4-m5 and its use part shows,
> the problem isn't new, we can emit a CPP_PADDING token to avoid it from
> being adjacent to whatever comes after the __VA_OPT__ (in this case there
> is nothing afterwards, true).
>
> In most cases these CPP_PADDING tokens don't matter, all other
> callers of cpp_get_token_with_location either ignore CPP_PADDING tokens
> completely (e.g. c_lex_with_flags) or they just remember them and
> take them into account when printing stuff whether there should be
> added whitespace or not (scan_translation_unit + token_streamer::stream).
> So, I think we should just ignore CPP_PADDING tokens the same way in
> _cpp_parse_expr.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
OK.
> 2022-05-27 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR preprocessor/105732
> * expr.cc (_cpp_parse_expr): Handle CPP_PADDING by just another
> token.
>
> * c-c++-common/cpp/va-opt-10.c: New test.
>
> --- libcpp/expr.cc.jj 2022-01-18 11:59:00.258972399 +0100
> +++ libcpp/expr.cc 2022-05-26 15:39:54.348780446 +0200
> @@ -1366,6 +1366,10 @@ _cpp_parse_expr (cpp_reader *pfile, bool
> op.op = CPP_UMINUS;
> break;
>
> + case CPP_PADDING:
> + lex_count--;
> + continue;
> +
> default:
> if ((int) op.op <= (int) CPP_EQ || (int) op.op >= (int) CPP_PLUS_EQ)
> SYNTAX_ERROR2_AT (op.loc,
> --- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/va-opt-10.c.jj 2022-05-26 15:54:40.279766330 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/va-opt-10.c 2022-05-26 15:54:24.028928687 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> +/* PR preprocessor/105732 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-std=gnu99" { target c } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-std=c++20" { target c++ } } */
> +
> +#define m1(p1, p2, p3) p3
> +#define m2(p1, ...) 1##__VA_OPT__(foo)
> +#define m3(...) m1(1, 2, m2)
> +#define m4(p1, ...) 1 __VA_OPT__()
> +#define m5(...) m1(1, 2, m4)
> +#if m3(,)(,)
> +#else
> +#error
> +#endif
> +#if m5(,)(,)
> +#else
> +#error
> +#endif
>
> Jakub
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-29 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-27 8:16 Jakub Jelinek
2022-05-29 19:54 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bee61ebc-c3f4-a010-eaa3-4d49bc3237fe@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=polacek@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).