From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1787 invoked by alias); 4 May 2011 05:27:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 1779 invoked by uid 22791); 4 May 2011 05:27:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-wy0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-wy0-f175.google.com) (74.125.82.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 05:27:29 +0000 Received: by wye20 with SMTP id 20so679213wye.20 for ; Tue, 03 May 2011 22:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.221.22 with SMTP id q22mr672438wep.37.1304486847712; Tue, 03 May 2011 22:27:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (server51262.uk2net.com [83.170.92.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o1sm358834wej.8.2011.05.03.22.27.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 03 May 2011 22:27:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Docs: extend.texi: Remove trailing blanks from lines Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 06:31:00 -0000 From: Michael Witten To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <378e16b9-5d40-427c-8b4e-00700b2ad30c-mfwitten@gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-05/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2 On Tue, 3 May 2011 22:52:25 +0200 (CEST), Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > sed -i "s/[ $(printf '\t')]\{1,\}\$//" trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi > > I believe we usually don't do whitespace changes just for the sake > of cleaning up things. > > Unless someone else indicates otherwise, I believe this patch is > rejected. To what do we owe this tradition other than laziness? Shall I match the mindlessness of this rule by introducing a variant patch that also alters non-whitespace on the offending lines? Sincerely, Michael Witten