From: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: segher@kernel.crashing.org, dje.gcc@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] rs6000: Fix some missing built-in attributes [PR104004]
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:50:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf94891ecd8995fa1a4a2c3f9366cc88c969edfa.1643390744.git.wschmidt@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1643390744.git.wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
PR104004 caught some misses on my part in converting to the new built-in
function infrastructure. In particular, I forgot to mark all of the "nosoft"
built-ins, and one of those should also have been marked "no32bit".
Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with no regressions.
Is this okay for trunk?
Thanks,
Bill
2022-01-27 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
gcc/
* config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.def (MFFSL): Mark nosoft.
(MTFSB0): Likewise.
(MTFSB1): Likewise.
(SET_FPSCR_RN): Likewise.
(SET_FPSCR_DRN): Mark nosoft and no32bit.
---
gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
index c8f0cf332eb..98619a649e3 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@
; processors, this builtin automatically falls back to mffs on older
; platforms. Thus it appears here in the [always] stanza.
double __builtin_mffsl ();
- MFFSL rs6000_mffsl {}
+ MFFSL rs6000_mffsl {nosoft}
; This is redundant with __builtin_pack_ibm128, as it requires long
; double to be __ibm128. Should probably be deprecated.
@@ -226,10 +226,10 @@
MFTB rs6000_mftb_di {32bit}
void __builtin_mtfsb0 (const int<0,31>);
- MTFSB0 rs6000_mtfsb0 {}
+ MTFSB0 rs6000_mtfsb0 {nosoft}
void __builtin_mtfsb1 (const int<0,31>);
- MTFSB1 rs6000_mtfsb1 {}
+ MTFSB1 rs6000_mtfsb1 {nosoft}
void __builtin_mtfsf (const int<0,255>, double);
MTFSF rs6000_mtfsf {}
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
PACK_IF packif {}
void __builtin_set_fpscr_rn (const int[0,3]);
- SET_FPSCR_RN rs6000_set_fpscr_rn {}
+ SET_FPSCR_RN rs6000_set_fpscr_rn {nosoft}
const double __builtin_unpack_ibm128 (__ibm128, const int<0,1>);
UNPACK_IF unpackif {}
@@ -2969,7 +2969,7 @@
PACK_TD packtd {}
void __builtin_set_fpscr_drn (const int[0,7]);
- SET_FPSCR_DRN rs6000_set_fpscr_drn {}
+ SET_FPSCR_DRN rs6000_set_fpscr_drn {nosoft,no32bit}
const unsigned long long __builtin_unpack_dec128 (_Decimal128, \
const int<0,1>);
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-28 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-28 17:50 [PATCH 0/8] rs6000: Built-in function cleanups and bug fixes Bill Schmidt
2022-01-28 17:50 ` [PATCH 1/8] rs6000: More factoring of overload processing Bill Schmidt
2022-01-28 19:11 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-01-28 21:19 ` Bill Schmidt
2022-01-28 23:09 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-01 14:49 ` [PATCH v2 " Bill Schmidt
2022-02-01 21:48 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-02 18:46 ` Bill Schmidt
2022-02-03 14:44 ` [PATCH v3 " Bill Schmidt
2022-02-04 1:24 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-01-28 17:50 ` [PATCH 2/8] rs6000: Don't #ifdef "short" built-in names Bill Schmidt
2022-01-28 20:32 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-01-28 21:21 ` Bill Schmidt
2022-01-28 17:50 ` [PATCH 3/8] rs6000: Convert <x> built-in constraints to <x,y> form Bill Schmidt
2022-01-28 23:24 ` [PATCH 3/8] rs6000: Convert <x> built-in constraints to <x, y> form Segher Boessenkool
2022-01-31 17:21 ` [PATCH 3/8] rs6000: Convert <x> built-in constraints to <x,y> form Bill Schmidt
2022-01-31 17:28 ` [PATCH 3/8] rs6000: Convert <x> built-in constraints to <x, y> form Segher Boessenkool
2022-01-31 17:31 ` [PATCH 3/8] rs6000: Convert <x> built-in constraints to <x,y> form Bill Schmidt
2022-02-01 14:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] rs6000: Unify error messages for built-in constant restrictions Bill Schmidt
2022-02-01 22:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-01-28 17:50 ` [PATCH 4/8] rs6000: Consolidate target built-ins code Bill Schmidt
2022-01-31 21:32 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-01-31 22:01 ` Bill Schmidt
2022-01-31 22:33 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-01-28 17:50 ` [PATCH 5/8] rs6000: Fix LE code gen for vec_cnt[lt]z_lsbb [PR95082] Bill Schmidt
2022-02-01 23:01 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-01-28 17:50 ` [PATCH 6/8] rs6000: Remove -m[no-]fold-gimple flag [PR103686] Bill Schmidt
2022-02-02 23:21 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-01-28 17:50 ` [PATCH 7/8] rs6000: vec_neg built-ins wrongly require POWER8 Bill Schmidt
2022-02-07 15:48 ` Bill Schmidt
2022-03-30 18:04 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-01-28 17:50 ` Bill Schmidt [this message]
2022-03-15 13:18 ` rs6000 patch ping: [PATCH 8/8] rs6000: Fix some missing built-in attributes [PR104004] Jakub Jelinek
2022-03-30 12:28 ` rs6000 patch ping^2: " Jakub Jelinek
2022-03-30 23:07 ` rs6000 patch ping: " Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-31 22:17 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-30 17:41 ` will schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf94891ecd8995fa1a4a2c3f9366cc88c969edfa.1643390744.git.wschmidt@linux.ibm.com \
--to=wschmidt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).