From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xry111@mengyan1223.wang>
Received: from mengyan1223.wang (mengyan1223.wang [89.208.246.23])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8D50385840E;
 Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:17:57 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org C8D50385840E
Received: from [192.168.124.4] (unknown [113.200.174.5])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 (Authenticated sender: xry111@mengyan1223.wang)
 by mengyan1223.wang (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6439266530;
 Fri, 30 Jul 2021 04:17:55 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <c083490ff12c7d5b819193a17c559c19a56263f2.camel@mengyan1223.wang>
Subject: Re: PING^5: [PATCH] mips: add MSA vec_cmp and vec_cmpu expand
 pattern [PR101132]
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@mengyan1223.wang>
To: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, marxin@gcc.gnu.org, Matthew Fortune
 <mfortune@gmail.com>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:17:53 +0800
In-Reply-To: <mptczr0i5w7.fsf@arm.com>
References: <1c61137b2e714a8a45e2b078a79851acc2eb5b8c.camel@mengyan1223.wang>
 <4bd3eabc82dd007b1ed684aa2f1f720918740986.camel@mengyan1223.wang>
 <mptczr0i5w7.fsf@arm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.3 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3032.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS,
 SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 08:17:58 -0000

On Fri, 2021-07-30 at 09:04 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Xi Ruoyao <xry111@mengyan1223.wang> writes:
> > Ping again.
> 
> Sorry that this has gone unreviewed for so long.  I think in practice
> the MIPS port is essentially unmaintained at this point -- it would
> be great if someone would volunteer :-)

A company working on MIPS has contacted me and said one of their
employees may contact the SC and take the role of MIPS maintainer.  Not
sure their progress though.

> It isn't really appropriate for me to review MIPS stuff given that I
> work
> for a company that has a competing architecture.  I think Jeff
> expressed
> similar concerns given his new role.

> That said, the patch looks clearly correct to me, so please go ahead
> and apply (to trunk and GCC 11).  Thanks for your patience.

Thanks!

It has been 5 weeks so it's better to rebase and bootstrap & test it
again.  I'll commit it if there is no regression.
-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@mengyan1223.wang>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University