public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>, Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: fix ICE with designated initializer [PR110114]
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 15:24:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c10171ca-b8fc-698d-2907-d9b096856c73@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZLgtpWm2PpsZ2iyl@redhat.com>

On 7/19/23 14:38, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 02:32:15PM -0400, Patrick Palka wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, Marek Polacek wrote:
>>
>>> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
>>
>> LGTM.  It might be preferable to check COMPLETE_TYPE_P in the caller
>> instead, so that we avoid inspecting CLASSTYPE_NON_AGGREGATE on an
>> incomplete class type, and so that the caller doesn't "commit" to
>> building an aggregate conversion.
> 
> Perhaps.  I wanted to avoid the call to build_user_type_conversion_1.
> I could add an early return to implicit_conversion_1 but I'd have to
> move some code around not to check COMPLETE_TYPE_P before complete_type.

Maybe return NULL for the incomplete case here, rather than just 
skipping reshape_init?

   /* Call reshape_init early to remove redundant braces.  */
   if (expr && BRACE_ENCLOSED_INITIALIZER_P (expr)
       && CLASS_TYPE_P (to)
       && COMPLETE_TYPE_P (complete_type (to))
       && !CLASSTYPE_NON_AGGREGATE (to))
     {
       expr = reshape_init (to, expr, complain);
       if (expr == error_mark_node)
         return NULL;
       from = TREE_TYPE (expr);
     }

If that doesn't work, the patch is fine as-is.

>>> -- >8 --
>>>
>>> r13-1227 added an assert checking that the index in a CONSTRUCTOR
>>> is a FIELD_DECL.  That's a reasonable assumption but in this case
>>> we never called reshape_init due to the type being incomplete, and
>>> so the index remained an identifier node: get_class_binding never
>>> got around to looking up the FIELD_DECL.
>>>
>>> We can avoid the crash by returning early in build_aggr_conv; we'd
>>> return NULL anyway due to:
>>>
>>>    if (i < CONSTRUCTOR_NELTS (ctor))
>>>      return NULL;
>>>
>>> 	PR c++/110114
>>>
>>> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> 	* call.cc (build_aggr_conv): Return early if the type isn't
>>> 	complete.
>>>
>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> 	* g++.dg/cpp2a/desig28.C: New test.
>>> 	* g++.dg/cpp2a/desig29.C: New test.
>>> ---
>>>   gcc/cp/call.cc                       |  5 +++++
>>>   gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/desig28.C | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>>>   gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/desig29.C | 10 ++++++++++
>>>   3 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/desig28.C
>>>   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/desig29.C
>>>
>>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/call.cc b/gcc/cp/call.cc
>>> index b55230d98aa..0af20a81717 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/cp/call.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/cp/call.cc
>>> @@ -986,6 +986,11 @@ build_aggr_conv (tree type, tree ctor, int flags, tsubst_flags_t complain)
>>>     tree empty_ctor = NULL_TREE;
>>>     hash_set<tree, true> pset;
>>>   
>>> +  /* We've called complete_type on TYPE before calling this function, but
>>> +     perhaps it wasn't successful.  */
>>> +  if (!COMPLETE_TYPE_P (type))
>>> +    return nullptr;
>>> +
>>>     /* We already called reshape_init in implicit_conversion, but it might not
>>>        have done anything in the case of parenthesized aggr init.  */
>>>   
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/desig28.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/desig28.C
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..b63265fea51
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/desig28.C
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
>>> +// PR c++/110114
>>> +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
>>> +
>>> +struct A {
>>> +    int a,b;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct B;
>>> +
>>> +void foo(const A &) {}
>>> +void foo(const B &) {}
>>> +
>>> +int
>>> +main ()
>>> +{
>>> +  foo({.a=0});
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/desig29.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/desig29.C
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..bd1a82b041d
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/desig29.C
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>>> +// PR c++/110114
>>> +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
>>> +
>>> +struct B;
>>> +
>>> +void foo(const B &) {}
>>> +
>>> +int main() {
>>> +    foo({.a=0}); // { dg-error "invalid" }
>>> +}
>>>
>>> base-commit: 2971ff7b1d564ac04b537d907c70e6093af70832
>>> -- 
>>> 2.41.0
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> Marek
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-19 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-19 18:00 Marek Polacek
2023-07-19 18:32 ` Patrick Palka
2023-07-19 18:38   ` Marek Polacek
2023-07-19 19:24     ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2023-07-20 14:08       ` [PATCH v2] " Marek Polacek
2023-07-20 14:29         ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c10171ca-b8fc-698d-2907-d9b096856c73@redhat.com \
    --to=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=polacek@redhat.com \
    --cc=ppalka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).