On Sat, 21 Jan 2023, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> A new newlib version has been realized yesterday: newlib-4.3.0 (yearly
> snapshot)
:
> Comments? Suggestions? – If there are none, I intent to commit the patch 
> as obvious.

Is it maybe a little tough to bump the minimal requirement to something 
only released yesterday? Or is this not an issue looking at the use cases?
(Genuine question. Maybe nothing to worry at all.)

And, this predates your patch, in one instance we refer to Newlib (upper 
case9, in the other to newlib (lower case). Would it make sense to 
converge to one?


Not an objection to the patch - you are the expert - just two (naive) 
questions.

Gerald