From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29334 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2004 09:45:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29325 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2004 09:45:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Apr 2004 09:45:53 -0000 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BFVLc-0001dM-00 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:45:52 +0200 Received: from paride.rett.polimi.it ([131.175.65.135]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:45:52 +0200 Received: from bonzini by paride.rett.polimi.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:45:52 +0200 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: "Paolo Bonzini" Subject: Re: Patch ping Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 09:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: paride.rett.polimi.it X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-SW-Source: 2004-04/txt/msg01136.txt.bz2 > Paolo, > > on which platform did you bootstrap this? i686-pc-linux-gnu, all languages except Ada/treelang. > It causes build errors on > both Linux/x86-64 and Linux/ia64 as reported by Andreas Schwab and > myself on the main GCC list yesterday. > > Please fix the regressions that your patch has caused. As I wrote on gcc, I don't think I can be blamed on this. The bugs are not in the code I touched, but only in the code I enabled. All I can do is disabling -frename-registers on the affected archs, as per the attached patch disable-ada-rename-regs.patch. Also, I guess would have been found earlier if the Ada testsuite had tested all optimization levels instead of -O2 only (and it used to be -O0, which seems really strange to me!). Can you please try the attached ada-testsuite.patch on a two-three days old gcc, on Linux/x86-64 and/or Linux/ia64? Ok to commit both patches? Paolo begin 666 ada-testsuite.patch M26YD97@Z(')U;E]A8V%TV=C8V9L86=S/2(M3S(B?0HK.B D>V=N871F;&%GPH@)"H*0$ @+3V=C8V9L86=S?2(**V1I2 B"0D]/3T@86-A=',@V=C8V9L86=S?2(**V1I#8T+'8*6YC:')O;F]U#H@:6$V-"]T+6EA-C0*/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T] M/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T]/3T] M/3T]/0I20U,@9FEL93H@+V-V