public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] DSE: Use the constant store source if possible
Date: Sat, 28 May 2022 12:37:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6e04fa1-c3b2-55c3-f0d7-9a7f65b3614d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yo/mVc4I+l9zd+KZ@gmail.com>



On 5/26/2022 2:43 PM, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 04:14:17PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:30 AM Richard Sandiford
>>> <richard.sandiford@arm.com> wrote:
>>>> "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>>>>> On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 12:38:06PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 5:02 AM H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches
>>>>>> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> When recording store for RTL dead store elimination, check if the source
>>>>>>> register is set only once to a constant.  If yes, record the constant
>>>>>>> as the store source.  It eliminates unrolled zero stores after memset 0
>>>>>>> in a loop where a vector register is used as the zero store source.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gcc/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          PR rtl-optimization/105638
>>>>>>>          * dse.cc (record_store): Use the constant source if the source
>>>>>>>          register is set only once.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gcc/testsuite/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>          PR rtl-optimization/105638
>>>>>>>          * g++.target/i386/pr105638.C: New test.
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>   gcc/dse.cc                               | 19 ++++++++++
>>>>>>>   gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr105638.C | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>   2 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr105638.C
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/gcc/dse.cc b/gcc/dse.cc
>>>>>>> index 30c11cee034..0433dd3d846 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/gcc/dse.cc
>>>>>>> +++ b/gcc/dse.cc
>>>>>>> @@ -1508,6 +1508,25 @@ record_store (rtx body, bb_info_t bb_info)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>            if (tem && CONSTANT_P (tem))
>>>>>>>              const_rhs = tem;
>>>>>>> +         else
>>>>>>> +           {
>>>>>>> +             /* If RHS is set only once to a constant, set CONST_RHS
>>>>>>> +                to the constant.  */
>>>>>>> +             df_ref def = DF_REG_DEF_CHAIN (REGNO (rhs));
>>>>>>> +             if (def != nullptr
>>>>>>> +                 && !DF_REF_IS_ARTIFICIAL (def)
>>>>>>> +                 && !DF_REF_NEXT_REG (def))
>>>>>>> +               {
>>>>>>> +                 rtx_insn *def_insn = DF_REF_INSN (def);
>>>>>>> +                 rtx def_body = PATTERN (def_insn);
>>>>>>> +                 if (GET_CODE (def_body) == SET)
>>>>>>> +                   {
>>>>>>> +                     rtx def_src = SET_SRC (def_body);
>>>>>>> +                     if (CONSTANT_P (def_src))
>>>>>>> +                       const_rhs = def_src;
>>>>>> doesn't DSE have its own tracking of stored values?  Shouldn't we
>>>>> It tracks stored values only within the basic block.  When RTL loop
>>>>> invariant motion hoists a constant initialization out of the loop into
>>>>> a separate basic block, the constant store value becomes unknown
>>>>> within the original basic block.
>>>>>
>>>>>> improve _that_ if it is not enough?  I also wonder if you need to
>>>>> My patch extends DSE stored value tracking to include the constant which
>>>>> is set only once in another basic block.
>>>>>
>>>>>> verify the SET isn't partial?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the v2 patch to check that the constant is set by a non-partial
>>>>> unconditional load.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK for master?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> H.J.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> RTL DSE tracks redundant constant stores within a basic block.  When RTL
>>>>> loop invariant motion hoists a constant initialization out of the loop
>>>>> into a separate basic block, the constant store value becomes unknown
>>>>> within the original basic block.  When recording store for RTL DSE, check
>>>>> if the source register is set only once to a constant by a non-partial
>>>>> unconditional load.  If yes, record the constant as the constant store
>>>>> source.  It eliminates unrolled zero stores after memset 0 in a loop
>>>>> where a vector register is used as the zero store source.
>>>>>
>>>>> gcc/
>>>>>
>>>>>        PR rtl-optimization/105638
>>>>>        * dse.cc (record_store): Use the constant source if the source
>>>>>        register is set only once.
>>>>>
>>>>> gcc/testsuite/
>>>>>
>>>>>        PR rtl-optimization/105638
>>>>>        * g++.target/i386/pr105638.C: New test.
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   gcc/dse.cc                               | 22 ++++++++++++
>>>>>   gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr105638.C | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>   2 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
>>>>>   create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr105638.C
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/gcc/dse.cc b/gcc/dse.cc
>>>>> index 30c11cee034..af8e88dac32 100644
>>>>> --- a/gcc/dse.cc
>>>>> +++ b/gcc/dse.cc
>>>>> @@ -1508,6 +1508,28 @@ record_store (rtx body, bb_info_t bb_info)
>>>>>
>>>>>          if (tem && CONSTANT_P (tem))
>>>>>            const_rhs = tem;
>>>>> +       else
>>>>> +         {
>>>>> +           /* If RHS is set only once to a constant, set CONST_RHS
>>>>> +              to the constant.  */
>>>>> +           df_ref def = DF_REG_DEF_CHAIN (REGNO (rhs));
>>>>> +           if (def != nullptr
>>>>> +               && !DF_REF_IS_ARTIFICIAL (def)
>>>>> +               && !(DF_REF_FLAGS (def)
>>>>> +                    & (DF_REF_PARTIAL | DF_REF_CONDITIONAL))
>>>>> +               && !DF_REF_NEXT_REG (def))
>>>> Can we introduce a helper for this?  There are already similar tests
>>>> in ira and loop-iv, and it seems a bit too complex to have to open-code
>>>> each time.
>>> I can use find_single_def_src in loop-iv.cc:
>>>
>>> /* If REGNO has a single definition, return its known value, otherwise return
>>>     null.  */
>>>
>>> rtx
>>> find_single_def_src (unsigned int regno)
>> Yeah, reusing that sounds good.  Perhaps we should move it into df-core.cc,
>> alongside the df_reg_used group of functions.
>>
>> I think the mode check in your original patch should be kept though,
>> so how about we change the parameter to an rtx reg and use rtx_equal in:
>>
>>        rtx set = single_set (DF_REF_INSN (adef));
>>        if (set == NULL || !REG_P (SET_DEST (set))
>> 	  || REGNO (SET_DEST (set)) != regno)
>> 	return NULL_RTX;
> Fixed.
>
>> rather than the existing !REG_P and REGNO checks.  We should also add:
>>
>>> and do
>>>
>>>               /* If RHS is set only once to a constant, set CONST_RHS
>>>                   to the constant.  */
>>>                rtx def_src = find_single_def_src (REGNO (rhs));
>>>                if (def_src != nullptr && CONSTANT_P (def_src))
>>>                  {
>>>                    df_ref def = DF_REG_DEF_CHAIN (REGNO (rhs));
>>>                    if (!(DF_REF_FLAGS (def)
>>>                          & (DF_REF_PARTIAL | DF_REF_CONDITIONAL)))
>> …this check to the function, since it's needed for correctness even
>> in the loop-iv.cc use.
> Fixed.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Richard
> Here is the v3 patch.  OK for master?
>
> Thanks.
>
> H.J.
> ---
> RTL DSE tracks redundant constant stores within a basic block.  When RTL
> loop invariant motion hoists a constant initialization out of the loop
> into a separate basic block, the constant store value becomes unknown
> within the original basic block.  When recording store for RTL DSE, check
> if the source register is set only once to a constant by a non-partial
> unconditional load.  If yes, record the constant as the constant store
> source.  It eliminates unrolled zero stores after memset 0 in a loop
> where a vector register is used as the zero store source.
>
> Extract find_single_def_src from loop-iv.cc and move it to df-core.cc:
>
> 1. Rename to df_find_single_def_src.
> 2. Change the argument to rtx and use rtx_equal_p.
> 3. Return null for partial or conditional defs.
>
> gcc/
>
> 	PR rtl-optimization/105638
> 	* df-core.cc (df_find_single_def_sr): Moved and renamed from
> 	find_single_def_src in loop-iv.cc.  Change the argument to rtx
> 	and use rtx_equal_p.  Return null for partial or conditional
> 	defs.
> 	* df.h (df_find_single_def_src): New prototype.
> 	* dse.cc (record_store): Use the constant source if the source
> 	register is set only once.
> 	* loop-iv.cc (find_single_def_src): Moved to df-core.cc.
> 	(replace_single_def_regs): Replace find_single_def_src with
> 	df_find_single_def_src.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> 	PR rtl-optimization/105638
> 	* g++.target/i386/pr105638.C: New test.
Avoiding REG_EQUAL and only handling REG_EQUIV notes would be better 
here.  REG_EQUIV indicates the destination could be replaced with the 
source of the note at any point and semantically the code would still be 
valid.  REG_EQUAL doesn't give us that guarantee.

To allow REG_EQUAL you have to check that the block with the note 
dominates the use.

Jeff


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-28 18:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-21  3:01 [PATCH] DSE: Use the constant " H.J. Lu
2022-05-23 10:38 ` Richard Biener
2022-05-23 18:34   ` [PATCH v2] DSE: Use the constant store " H.J. Lu
2022-05-24  6:42     ` Richard Biener
2022-05-24 20:10       ` H.J. Lu
2022-05-25  9:22         ` Richard Biener
2022-05-25  9:30           ` Richard Sandiford
2022-05-25 19:01             ` H.J. Lu
2022-05-25  7:30     ` Richard Sandiford
2022-05-25 18:56       ` H.J. Lu
2022-05-26 15:14         ` Richard Sandiford
2022-05-26 20:43           ` [PATCH v3] " H.J. Lu
2022-05-28 18:37             ` Jeff Law [this message]
2022-05-29 21:43               ` H.J. Lu
2022-05-29 22:55                 ` Jeff Law
2022-05-30  8:28                   ` Richard Sandiford
2022-05-30 22:58                     ` Jeff Law
2022-05-30  8:35             ` Richard Sandiford
2022-05-31 17:12               ` [PATCH v4] " H.J. Lu
2022-06-01  7:20                 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-06-01 21:07                   ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c6e04fa1-c3b2-55c3-f0d7-9a7f65b3614d@gmail.com \
    --to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).