From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] DSE: Use the constant store source if possible
Date: Sat, 28 May 2022 12:37:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c6e04fa1-c3b2-55c3-f0d7-9a7f65b3614d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yo/mVc4I+l9zd+KZ@gmail.com>
On 5/26/2022 2:43 PM, H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 04:14:17PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:
>>> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:30 AM Richard Sandiford
>>> <richard.sandiford@arm.com> wrote:
>>>> "H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>>>>> On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 12:38:06PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 5:02 AM H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches
>>>>>> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> When recording store for RTL dead store elimination, check if the source
>>>>>>> register is set only once to a constant. If yes, record the constant
>>>>>>> as the store source. It eliminates unrolled zero stores after memset 0
>>>>>>> in a loop where a vector register is used as the zero store source.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gcc/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PR rtl-optimization/105638
>>>>>>> * dse.cc (record_store): Use the constant source if the source
>>>>>>> register is set only once.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gcc/testsuite/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PR rtl-optimization/105638
>>>>>>> * g++.target/i386/pr105638.C: New test.
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> gcc/dse.cc | 19 ++++++++++
>>>>>>> gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr105638.C | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
>>>>>>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr105638.C
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/gcc/dse.cc b/gcc/dse.cc
>>>>>>> index 30c11cee034..0433dd3d846 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/gcc/dse.cc
>>>>>>> +++ b/gcc/dse.cc
>>>>>>> @@ -1508,6 +1508,25 @@ record_store (rtx body, bb_info_t bb_info)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if (tem && CONSTANT_P (tem))
>>>>>>> const_rhs = tem;
>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>> + {
>>>>>>> + /* If RHS is set only once to a constant, set CONST_RHS
>>>>>>> + to the constant. */
>>>>>>> + df_ref def = DF_REG_DEF_CHAIN (REGNO (rhs));
>>>>>>> + if (def != nullptr
>>>>>>> + && !DF_REF_IS_ARTIFICIAL (def)
>>>>>>> + && !DF_REF_NEXT_REG (def))
>>>>>>> + {
>>>>>>> + rtx_insn *def_insn = DF_REF_INSN (def);
>>>>>>> + rtx def_body = PATTERN (def_insn);
>>>>>>> + if (GET_CODE (def_body) == SET)
>>>>>>> + {
>>>>>>> + rtx def_src = SET_SRC (def_body);
>>>>>>> + if (CONSTANT_P (def_src))
>>>>>>> + const_rhs = def_src;
>>>>>> doesn't DSE have its own tracking of stored values? Shouldn't we
>>>>> It tracks stored values only within the basic block. When RTL loop
>>>>> invariant motion hoists a constant initialization out of the loop into
>>>>> a separate basic block, the constant store value becomes unknown
>>>>> within the original basic block.
>>>>>
>>>>>> improve _that_ if it is not enough? I also wonder if you need to
>>>>> My patch extends DSE stored value tracking to include the constant which
>>>>> is set only once in another basic block.
>>>>>
>>>>>> verify the SET isn't partial?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the v2 patch to check that the constant is set by a non-partial
>>>>> unconditional load.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK for master?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> H.J.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> RTL DSE tracks redundant constant stores within a basic block. When RTL
>>>>> loop invariant motion hoists a constant initialization out of the loop
>>>>> into a separate basic block, the constant store value becomes unknown
>>>>> within the original basic block. When recording store for RTL DSE, check
>>>>> if the source register is set only once to a constant by a non-partial
>>>>> unconditional load. If yes, record the constant as the constant store
>>>>> source. It eliminates unrolled zero stores after memset 0 in a loop
>>>>> where a vector register is used as the zero store source.
>>>>>
>>>>> gcc/
>>>>>
>>>>> PR rtl-optimization/105638
>>>>> * dse.cc (record_store): Use the constant source if the source
>>>>> register is set only once.
>>>>>
>>>>> gcc/testsuite/
>>>>>
>>>>> PR rtl-optimization/105638
>>>>> * g++.target/i386/pr105638.C: New test.
>>>>> ---
>>>>> gcc/dse.cc | 22 ++++++++++++
>>>>> gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr105638.C | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+)
>>>>> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr105638.C
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/gcc/dse.cc b/gcc/dse.cc
>>>>> index 30c11cee034..af8e88dac32 100644
>>>>> --- a/gcc/dse.cc
>>>>> +++ b/gcc/dse.cc
>>>>> @@ -1508,6 +1508,28 @@ record_store (rtx body, bb_info_t bb_info)
>>>>>
>>>>> if (tem && CONSTANT_P (tem))
>>>>> const_rhs = tem;
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + {
>>>>> + /* If RHS is set only once to a constant, set CONST_RHS
>>>>> + to the constant. */
>>>>> + df_ref def = DF_REG_DEF_CHAIN (REGNO (rhs));
>>>>> + if (def != nullptr
>>>>> + && !DF_REF_IS_ARTIFICIAL (def)
>>>>> + && !(DF_REF_FLAGS (def)
>>>>> + & (DF_REF_PARTIAL | DF_REF_CONDITIONAL))
>>>>> + && !DF_REF_NEXT_REG (def))
>>>> Can we introduce a helper for this? There are already similar tests
>>>> in ira and loop-iv, and it seems a bit too complex to have to open-code
>>>> each time.
>>> I can use find_single_def_src in loop-iv.cc:
>>>
>>> /* If REGNO has a single definition, return its known value, otherwise return
>>> null. */
>>>
>>> rtx
>>> find_single_def_src (unsigned int regno)
>> Yeah, reusing that sounds good. Perhaps we should move it into df-core.cc,
>> alongside the df_reg_used group of functions.
>>
>> I think the mode check in your original patch should be kept though,
>> so how about we change the parameter to an rtx reg and use rtx_equal in:
>>
>> rtx set = single_set (DF_REF_INSN (adef));
>> if (set == NULL || !REG_P (SET_DEST (set))
>> || REGNO (SET_DEST (set)) != regno)
>> return NULL_RTX;
> Fixed.
>
>> rather than the existing !REG_P and REGNO checks. We should also add:
>>
>>> and do
>>>
>>> /* If RHS is set only once to a constant, set CONST_RHS
>>> to the constant. */
>>> rtx def_src = find_single_def_src (REGNO (rhs));
>>> if (def_src != nullptr && CONSTANT_P (def_src))
>>> {
>>> df_ref def = DF_REG_DEF_CHAIN (REGNO (rhs));
>>> if (!(DF_REF_FLAGS (def)
>>> & (DF_REF_PARTIAL | DF_REF_CONDITIONAL)))
>> …this check to the function, since it's needed for correctness even
>> in the loop-iv.cc use.
> Fixed.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Richard
> Here is the v3 patch. OK for master?
>
> Thanks.
>
> H.J.
> ---
> RTL DSE tracks redundant constant stores within a basic block. When RTL
> loop invariant motion hoists a constant initialization out of the loop
> into a separate basic block, the constant store value becomes unknown
> within the original basic block. When recording store for RTL DSE, check
> if the source register is set only once to a constant by a non-partial
> unconditional load. If yes, record the constant as the constant store
> source. It eliminates unrolled zero stores after memset 0 in a loop
> where a vector register is used as the zero store source.
>
> Extract find_single_def_src from loop-iv.cc and move it to df-core.cc:
>
> 1. Rename to df_find_single_def_src.
> 2. Change the argument to rtx and use rtx_equal_p.
> 3. Return null for partial or conditional defs.
>
> gcc/
>
> PR rtl-optimization/105638
> * df-core.cc (df_find_single_def_sr): Moved and renamed from
> find_single_def_src in loop-iv.cc. Change the argument to rtx
> and use rtx_equal_p. Return null for partial or conditional
> defs.
> * df.h (df_find_single_def_src): New prototype.
> * dse.cc (record_store): Use the constant source if the source
> register is set only once.
> * loop-iv.cc (find_single_def_src): Moved to df-core.cc.
> (replace_single_def_regs): Replace find_single_def_src with
> df_find_single_def_src.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> PR rtl-optimization/105638
> * g++.target/i386/pr105638.C: New test.
Avoiding REG_EQUAL and only handling REG_EQUIV notes would be better
here. REG_EQUIV indicates the destination could be replaced with the
source of the note at any point and semantically the code would still be
valid. REG_EQUAL doesn't give us that guarantee.
To allow REG_EQUAL you have to check that the block with the note
dominates the use.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-28 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-21 3:01 [PATCH] DSE: Use the constant " H.J. Lu
2022-05-23 10:38 ` Richard Biener
2022-05-23 18:34 ` [PATCH v2] DSE: Use the constant store " H.J. Lu
2022-05-24 6:42 ` Richard Biener
2022-05-24 20:10 ` H.J. Lu
2022-05-25 9:22 ` Richard Biener
2022-05-25 9:30 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-05-25 19:01 ` H.J. Lu
2022-05-25 7:30 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-05-25 18:56 ` H.J. Lu
2022-05-26 15:14 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-05-26 20:43 ` [PATCH v3] " H.J. Lu
2022-05-28 18:37 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2022-05-29 21:43 ` H.J. Lu
2022-05-29 22:55 ` Jeff Law
2022-05-30 8:28 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-05-30 22:58 ` Jeff Law
2022-05-30 8:35 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-05-31 17:12 ` [PATCH v4] " H.J. Lu
2022-06-01 7:20 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-06-01 21:07 ` H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c6e04fa1-c3b2-55c3-f0d7-9a7f65b3614d@gmail.com \
--to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).