From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 123510 invoked by alias); 22 May 2017 11:50:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 123497 invoked by uid 89); 22 May 2017 11:50:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:390 X-HELO: mail-yw0-f170.google.com Received: from mail-yw0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f170.google.com) (209.85.161.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 May 2017 11:50:23 +0000 Received: by mail-yw0-f170.google.com with SMTP id p73so47709430ywp.0 for ; Mon, 22 May 2017 04:50:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CDuSlstwMJ365EsrtdrAkTAYdU5iUl/K/qndLityCJY=; b=cHrcI5A+RHCcNKScvBbUjKXOkLg2sOVR5WHMF2lVilhYnl1NpxXNa50ctaPD9DzO1P GnWDE5kAEjpKPO93XTvEC2+qQqudDFLV85UDtTI7fdJfUuAB4qNo6FQrZFI43LO2VSFs ri+rpuNicv6ZE3jURllmruKEso3pt4k9T7ZyDF9NM1RsxpFLvoZmxrytAXHg7aQsqB0H +9S+GjeSY73UAAaaa3GmfuF5AnVJMbBYxNan8Vzq8eIeCXxcm3ExkE49S++7h4qp3+z6 4cT7mFNJMgbO+DvGp/E5DhA9JG+/Ek4OX9adtqDoer9XjVO75YxVopvPBx3Y7pO6Wmjp kdxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDFdUuhuz92qW2V27Z5HBzoQuGht7DvXFJX8QTeW72qTK5u5Hp9 NrsS61PQRJgekQ== X-Received: by 10.129.56.195 with SMTP id f186mr19306278ywa.298.1495453825049; Mon, 22 May 2017 04:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2620:10d:c0a3:20fb:f6d0:5ac5:64cd:f102? ([2620:10d:c091:200::94]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 141sm7048226ywf.66.2017.05.22.04.50.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 May 2017 04:50:24 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PTX] simplify movs To: Tom de Vries Cc: GCC Patches , Bernd Schmidt References: <565F09B9.10507@acm.org> <98572baf-842f-b13b-3073-d31838a679d1@mentor.com> From: Nathan Sidwell Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 12:11:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <98572baf-842f-b13b-3073-d31838a679d1@mentor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg01667.txt.bz2 On 05/21/2017 03:35 AM, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 12/02/2015 04:09 PM, Nathan Sidwell wrote: >> +/* Output a pattern for a move instruction. */ >> + >> +const char * >> +nvptx_output_mov_insn (rtx dst, rtx src) >> +{ > src_inner uses dst_mode rather than GET_MODE (src). I'm trying to > understand if that is intentional or not. I have no idea. -- Nathan Sidwell