From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13517 invoked by alias); 8 Jul 2016 10:42:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13508 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jul 2016 10:42:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=speaker X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 08 Jul 2016 10:42:37 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3D2ED64A0; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 10:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-6-21.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.6.21]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u68AgYXG031095; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 06:42:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] separate shrink-wrapping To: Segher Boessenkool References: <20160608151645.GA13163@gate.crashing.org> <20160614212411.GB13674@gate.crashing.org> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, dje.gcc@gmail.com From: Bernd Schmidt Message-ID: Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 10:42:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160614212411.GB13674@gate.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-07/txt/msg00381.txt.bz2 On 06/14/2016 11:24 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 06:43:23PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >> On 06/08/2016 05:16 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >>> There is no standard naming for this as far as I know. I'll gladly >>> use a better name anyone comes up with. >> >> Maybe just subpart? > > How about "factor"? Still sounds odd to me. "Component" maybe? Ideally a native speaker would help decide what sounds natural to them. Bernd