public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [PING][PATCH] rs6000: ROP - Emit hashst and hashchk insns on Power8 and later [PR114759]
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 16:24:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d05526e5-5f17-4c59-8d77-327b12df7ceb@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1a420e3e-3285-4e0b-87bd-6714fedc0f4f@linux.ibm.com>

Ping.    [Message-ID: <1a420e3e-3285-4e0b-87bd-6714fedc0f4f@linux.ibm.com>]

Peter


On 6/19/24 4:14 PM, Peter Bergner wrote:
> We currently only emit the ROP-protect hash* insns for Power10, where the
> insns were added to the architecture.  We want to emit them for earlier
> cpus (where they operate as NOPs), so that if those older binaries are
> ever executed on a Power10, then they'll be protected from ROP attacks.
> Binutils accepts hashst and hashchk back to Power8, so change GCC to emit
> them for Power8 and later.  This matches clang's behavior.
> 
> This patch is independent of the ROP shrink-wrap fix submitted earlier.
> This passed bootstrap and regtesting on powerpc64le-linux with no regressions.
> Ok for trunk?  
> 
> Peter
> 
> 
> 
> 2024-06-19  Peter Bergner  <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> gcc/
> 	PR target/114759
> 	* config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc (rs6000_stack_info): Use TARGET_POWER8.
> 	(rs6000_emit_prologue): Likewise.
> 	* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (hashchk): Likewise.
> 	(hashst): Likewise.
> 	Fix whitespace.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/
> 	PR target/114759
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr114759-2.c: New test.
> 	* lib/target-supports.exp (rop_ok): Use
> 	check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr8.
> ---
>  gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc             |  6 +++---
>  gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md                   |  6 +++---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr114759-2.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp         |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr114759-2.c
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc
> index c384e48e378..bd363b625a4 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-logue.cc
> @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ rs6000_stack_info (void)
>    info->calls_p = (!crtl->is_leaf || cfun->machine->ra_needs_full_frame);
>    info->rop_hash_size = 0;
>  
> -  if (TARGET_POWER10
> +  if (TARGET_POWER8
>        && info->calls_p
>        && DEFAULT_ABI == ABI_ELFv2
>        && rs6000_rop_protect)
> @@ -3277,7 +3277,7 @@ rs6000_emit_prologue (void)
>    /* NOTE: The hashst isn't needed if we're going to do a sibcall,
>       but there's no way to know that here.  Harmless except for
>       performance, of course.  */
> -  if (TARGET_POWER10 && rs6000_rop_protect && info->rop_hash_size != 0)
> +  if (TARGET_POWER8 && rs6000_rop_protect && info->rop_hash_size != 0)
>      {
>        gcc_assert (DEFAULT_ABI == ABI_ELFv2);
>        rtx stack_ptr = gen_rtx_REG (Pmode, STACK_POINTER_REGNUM);
> @@ -5056,7 +5056,7 @@ rs6000_emit_epilogue (enum epilogue_type epilogue_type)
>  
>    /* The ROP hash check must occur after the stack pointer is restored
>       (since the hash involves r1), and is not performed for a sibcall.  */
> -  if (TARGET_POWER10
> +  if (TARGET_POWER8
>        && rs6000_rop_protect
>        && info->rop_hash_size != 0
>        && epilogue_type != EPILOGUE_TYPE_SIBCALL)
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> index a5d20594789..694076e311f 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> @@ -15808,9 +15808,9 @@ (define_insn "*cmpeqb_internal"
>  
>  (define_insn "hashst"
>    [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "simple_offsettable_mem_operand" "=m")
> -        (unspec_volatile:DI [(match_operand:DI 1 "int_reg_operand" "r")]
> +	(unspec_volatile:DI [(match_operand:DI 1 "int_reg_operand" "r")]
>  			    UNSPEC_HASHST))]
> -  "TARGET_POWER10 && rs6000_rop_protect"
> +  "TARGET_POWER8 && rs6000_rop_protect"
>  {
>    static char templ[32];
>    const char *p = rs6000_privileged ? "p" : "";
> @@ -15823,7 +15823,7 @@ (define_insn "hashchk"
>    [(unspec_volatile [(match_operand:DI 0 "int_reg_operand" "r")
>  		     (match_operand:DI 1 "simple_offsettable_mem_operand" "m")]
>  		    UNSPEC_HASHCHK)]
> -  "TARGET_POWER10 && rs6000_rop_protect"
> +  "TARGET_POWER8 && rs6000_rop_protect"
>  {
>    static char templ[32];
>    const char *p = rs6000_privileged ? "p" : "";
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr114759-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr114759-2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..3881ebd416e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr114759-2.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power8 -mrop-protect" } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target rop_ok } Only enable on supported ABIs.  */
> +
> +/* Verify we generate ROP-protect hash insns when compiling for Power8.  */
> +
> +extern void foo (void);
> +
> +int
> +bar (void)
> +{
> +  foo ();
> +  return 5;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mhashst\M} 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mhashchk\M} 1 } } */
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> index e307f4e69ef..b1ef4e8eaef 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
> @@ -7339,7 +7339,7 @@ proc check_effective_target_powerpc_elfv2 { } {
>  # Return 1 if this is a PowerPC target supporting -mrop-protect
>  
>  proc check_effective_target_rop_ok { } {
> -    return [check_effective_target_power10_ok] && [check_effective_target_powerpc_elfv2]
> +    return [check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr8] && [check_effective_target_powerpc_elfv2]
>  }
>  
>  # The VxWorks SPARC simulator accepts only EM_SPARC executables and


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-25  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-19 21:14 [PATCH] " Peter Bergner
2024-06-24 21:24 ` Peter Bergner [this message]
2024-07-03  9:01 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-07-03 15:05   ` Peter Bergner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d05526e5-5f17-4c59-8d77-327b12df7ceb@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).