From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32C64385773C for ; Tue, 16 May 2023 08:03:45 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 32C64385773C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site; s=default; t=1684224222; bh=tB5VsfYsfgDwMReH3jHMbFRtW4anPhSY+ZTCDn2eBs0=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fXl9jZZBfTkYNCLSDOXCRYbQQ1lRrnFXKxIn+Q6zunveWodk00w0llrWDtP3Utqa2 8bZXF51qJ77X1F2XiIjAzS5TITndXPHaFyHCeXnBkI23SxppG1YyHD4mbKUeNEELAv nfqSxBhVrkBc32410HPeEC3jaOaZjqD9ovCCsr/0= Received: from [192.168.124.8] (unknown [113.140.11.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2106265B3F; Tue, 16 May 2023 04:03:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Machine_Mode: Extend machine_mode from 8 to 16 bits From: Xi Ruoyao To: "Li, Pan2" , Richard Sandiford Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , "juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai" , "kito.cheng@sifive.com" , "Wang, Yanzhang" , "jeffreyalaw@gmail.com" , "rguenther@suse.de" Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 16:03:37 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20230512050016.476110-1-pan2.li@intel.com> <20230513131325.1667305-1-pan2.li@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_SHORT,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Tue, 2023-05-16 at 07:55 +0000, Li, Pan2 via Gcc-patches wrote: > I see, thanks Richard for reminding. I am sorry I failed to locate > anywhere(doc or something else) mentioned such convention about ping, https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html suggests two week. > will follow the below convention in future. >=20 > Pan >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Sandiford =20 > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 3:30 PM > To: Li, Pan2 > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai; > kito.cheng@sifive.com; Wang, Yanzhang ; > jeffreyalaw@gmail.com; rguenther@suse.de > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Machine_Mode: Extend machine_mode from 8 to 16 > bits >=20 > "Li, Pan2" writes: > > Kindly ping for this PATCH v3. >=20 > The patch was sent on Saturday, so this is effectively pinging after > one working day in most of Europe and America.=C2=A0 That's too soon and > comes across as aggressive. >=20 > I realise you and others are working intensively on this.=C2=A0 But in a > sense that's part of the reason why reviews might seem slow.=C2=A0 The > volume of RVV patches recently has been pretty high, so it's been > difficult to keep up.=C2=A0 There are have also been many other non-RVV > patches that have been "unlocked" by stage 1 opening, so there's a > high volume from that as well. >=20 > Also, please bear in mind that most people active in the GCC community > have their own work to do and can only a dedicate a certain amount of > the day to reviews.=C2=A0 And reviewing patches can be time-consuming in > itsself. >=20 > So sometimes a patch will get a review within the day.=C2=A0 Sometimes it > will take a bit longer.=C2=A0 The fact that a patch doesn't get a respons= e > within one working day doesn't mean that it's been forgotten. >=20 > Thanks, > Richard --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University