Re: [PATCH] Document -fexcess-precision=16 in tm.texi

[Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>]

On 9/18/22 02:47, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Sep 2022 02:46:40 PDT (-0700), Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>> I just happened to stuble on this one while trying to sort out the
>> RISC-V bits.
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog
>>
>>     * doc/tm.texi (TARGET_C_EXCESS_PRECISION): Add 16.
>> ---
>>  gcc/doc/tm.texi | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/doc/tm.texi b/gcc/doc/tm.texi
>> index 858bfb80cec..7590924f2ca 100644
>> --- a/gcc/doc/tm.texi
>> +++ b/gcc/doc/tm.texi
>> @@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ of the excess precision explicitly added.  For
>>  @code{EXCESS_PRECISION_TYPE_FLOAT16}, and
>>  @code{EXCESS_PRECISION_TYPE_FAST}, the target should return the
>>  explicit excess precision that should be added depending on the
>> -value set for @option{-fexcess-precision=@r{[}standard@r{|}fast@r{]}}.
>> +value set for 
>> @option{-fexcess-precision=@r{[}standard@r{|}fast@r{|}16@r{]}}.
>>  Note that unpredictable explicit excess precision does not make sense,
>>  so a target should never return @code{FLT_EVAL_METHOD_UNPREDICTABLE}
>>  when @var{type} is @code{EXCESS_PRECISION_TYPE_STANDARD},
> 
> Just pinging this one as I'm not sure if it's OK to self-approve -- no 
> rush on my end, I already figured it out so I don't need the 
> documentation any more.

This is fine, looks like a trivial correction.

-Sandra