Re: [PATCH] analyzer: Fix regression bug after r14-1632-g9589a46ddadc8b [PR110198]

[David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>]

On Thu, 2023-06-29 at 20:45 +0200, priour.be@gmail.com wrote:
> From: benjamin priour <priour.be@gmail.com>
> 
> See below formatting updates on my patch.
> In mail
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-June/623140.html,
> David Malcolm says regtesting failed for him.
> 
> So I did it once more this morning rebased on fresh trunk dc93a0f633b
> and target x86_64-linux-gnu, the output was similar to last time:
> 
>     # from gcc_sources_testing 
>     gcc/contrib/compare_tests ../gcc_sources_control/build build
> 
>     # Comparing directories
>     ## Dir1=../gcc_sources_control/build: 8 sum files
>     ## Dir2=build: 8 sum files
>     
>     # Comparing 8 common sum files
>     ## /bin/sh gcc/contrib/compare_tests  /tmp/gxx-sum1.750468
> /tmp/gxx-sum2.750468
>     Tests that now work, but didn't before (3 tests):
> 
>     g++.dg/analyzer/pr100244.C  -std=c++14  (test for warnings, line
> 17)
>     g++.dg/analyzer/pr100244.C  -std=c++17  (test for warnings, line
> 17)
>     g++.dg/analyzer/pr100244.C  -std=c++20  (test for warnings, line
> 17)
>     
>     # No differences found in 8 common sum files
> 
> Can you confirm formatting of the patch below, and perhaps regtest it
> ?

Looks good to me; you can go ahead and push this to trunk.

Thanks
Dave