From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45FDF3858D20 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:05:41 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 45FDF3858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2A96i2dK007342; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:05:40 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=OrSzz/J8USEmztYJ1h7xxEWkIXwHrIz2XMttIACFu8M=; b=BGdx/APZzsQ47zH2UDRUlRA16Mxd6U4jhGEU39CIvtId9/+1b4SqmWV2LZNLxdwkB2Sk GW0nOiK2UEce90mbHEjoj4bVTO9hn89dqvJ+fSbMwwFFQG9XyjlKDwOZSnGsyBAFUnsc BzsRQjI9dl4K+fpG5ZHz/JOnoNpYLG6Hlo+i/SsIYU9duixlWZg3387YLDoTtx/Eru/Y k1ai4A6mtwNQEuQWQzGFUNWxf4UZp7ABOcXsUmJ8zRjuukBFd4GZ+VJJquioz3phKJMe IddwG1QNfeGRQIqpipvwmrbgRcXB5QJGqWedZzHe6ZLx0ZBfPofiUFLEPMZGi9hFjoN/ Pw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3kr76nrns1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Nov 2022 07:05:39 +0000 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 2A96xExf013474; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:05:39 GMT Received: from ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (6b.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.107]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3kr76nrnrb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Nov 2022 07:05:39 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 2A96oreh014722; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:05:37 GMT Received: from b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.192]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3kngp5ktkp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 Nov 2022 07:05:37 +0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06avi18626390.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 2A96xobX45875704 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 9 Nov 2022 06:59:50 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0313C42045; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:05:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD7342041; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:05:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.200.35.229] (unknown [9.200.35.229]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2022 07:05:32 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 15:05:31 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtl: Try to remove EH edges after {pro,epi}logue generation [PR90259] Content-Language: en-US To: Eric Botcazou , Richard Biener Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Segher Boessenkool , Peter Bergner , Jeff Law References: <454e83e7-e7a2-6e10-e051-b33c2d1b580d@linux.ibm.com> <13136293.uLZWGnKmhe@fomalhaut> From: "Kewen.Lin" In-Reply-To: <13136293.uLZWGnKmhe@fomalhaut> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 3Im2GaBOkSJzNhbaV1qQwVbOtZw_erNr X-Proofpoint-GUID: awzLdqt1GxIAOPvcDhdiWa0kB-vdGZye X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.219,Aquarius:18.0.895,Hydra:6.0.545,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-11-09_01,2022-11-08_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=898 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2210170000 definitions=main-2211090050 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Richi and Eric, Thanks for your reviews and comments! on 2022/11/8 18:37, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> It looks reasonable - OK if the others CCed have no comments. > > My only comment is that it needs to be tested with languages enabling -fnon- > call-exceptions by default (Ada & Go), if not already done. > The previous testings on powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu covered language Go, but not Ada. I re-tested it with languages c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,go,ada on powerpc64le-linux-gnu, the result looked good. Both x86 and aarch64 cfarm machines which I used for testing don't have gnat installed, do you think testing Ada on ppc64le is enough? BR, Kewen