From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>
To: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: jason@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: stream PACK_EXPANSION_EXTRA_ARGS [PR106761]
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 07:32:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5956760-cc31-b451-5bc3-f09e1d4a16fc@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220919135229.86545-1-ppalka@redhat.com>
On 9/19/22 09:52, Patrick Palka wrote:
> It looks like some xtreme-header-* tests are failing after the libstdc++
> change r13-2158-g02f6b405f0e9dc ultimately because we're neglecting
> to stream PACK_EXPANSION_EXTRA_ARGS, which leads to false equivalences
> of different partial instantiations of _TupleConstraints::__constructible.
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
>
> PR c++/106761
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> * module.cc (trees_out::type_node) <case TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION>:
> Stream PACK_EXPANSION_EXTRA_ARGS.
> (trees_in::tree_node) <case TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION>: Likewise.
Looks good, I wonder why I missed that. (I guess extracting a testcase
out of the headers was too tricky?)
nathan
> ---
> gcc/cp/module.cc | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/module.cc b/gcc/cp/module.cc
> index 1a1ff5be574..9a9ef4e3332 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/module.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/module.cc
> @@ -8922,6 +8922,7 @@ trees_out::type_node (tree type)
> if (streaming_p ())
> u (PACK_EXPANSION_LOCAL_P (type));
> tree_node (PACK_EXPANSION_PARAMETER_PACKS (type));
> + tree_node (PACK_EXPANSION_EXTRA_ARGS (type));
> break;
>
> case TYPENAME_TYPE:
> @@ -9455,12 +9456,14 @@ trees_in::tree_node (bool is_use)
> {
> bool local = u ();
> tree param_packs = tree_node ();
> + tree extra_args = tree_node ();
> if (!get_overrun ())
> {
> tree expn = cxx_make_type (TYPE_PACK_EXPANSION);
> SET_TYPE_STRUCTURAL_EQUALITY (expn);
> PACK_EXPANSION_PATTERN (expn) = res;
> PACK_EXPANSION_PARAMETER_PACKS (expn) = param_packs;
> + PACK_EXPANSION_EXTRA_ARGS (expn) = extra_args;
> PACK_EXPANSION_LOCAL_P (expn) = local;
> res = expn;
> }
--
Nathan Sidwell
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-20 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-19 13:52 Patrick Palka
2022-09-20 11:32 ` Nathan Sidwell [this message]
2022-09-20 14:08 ` Patrick Palka
2022-09-20 14:14 ` Nathan Sidwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d5956760-cc31-b451-5bc3-f09e1d4a16fc@acm.org \
--to=nathan@acm.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=ppalka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).