public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
Cc: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
	Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Gcc Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [v3][PATCH 2/2] Update documentation to clarify a GCC extension (PR77650)
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:56:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d627a9-3fd3-8032-114b-341d5d72cab3@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <501E355F-44A2-4B0F-B3A7-AFDD4BC0AAC6@oracle.com>

On Thu, 23 Feb 2023, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:

> But the following:
> 
> struct flex1  { int length1; char data1[]; };
> struct flex2  { int length2; char data2[]; };
> union union_flex { struct flex1 f1; struct flex2 f2; };  /* this is C standard.  */
> 
> struct out_flex { int n; union union_flex flex_data1;};  /* this is GNU extension.  */
> 
> Should add this item into the documentation?

"union that contains a structure with a flexible array member" is just 
like "structure with a flexible array member".  I suppose the 
documentation should try to make that clear, without repeating it too much 
for every separate case.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-24  0:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-11  0:50 [v3][PATCH 0/2] Handle component_ref to a structure/union field including FAM for builtin_object_size Qing Zhao
2023-02-11  0:50 ` [v3][PATCH 1/2] Handle component_ref to a structre/union field including C99 FAM [PR101832] Qing Zhao
2023-02-17 13:57   ` Qing Zhao
2023-02-23 14:12   ` Fwd: " Qing Zhao
2023-02-11  0:50 ` [v3][PATCH 2/2] Update documentation to clarify a GCC extension (PR77650) Qing Zhao
2023-02-17 13:58   ` Qing Zhao
2023-02-23 14:14   ` Fwd: " Qing Zhao
2023-02-23 21:24     ` Joseph Myers
2023-02-23 22:04       ` Qing Zhao
2023-02-23 22:30         ` Qing Zhao
2023-02-24  0:56           ` Joseph Myers [this message]
2023-02-24 13:50             ` Qing Zhao
2023-02-17 13:57 ` [v3][PATCH 0/2] Handle component_ref to a structure/union field including FAM for builtin_object_size Qing Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d627a9-3fd3-8032-114b-341d5d72cab3@codesourcery.com \
    --to=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).