From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 117253 invoked by alias); 16 Nov 2019 00:03:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 117242 invoked by uid 89); 16 Nov 2019 00:03:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_JMF_BL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=H*r:sk:mailout, H*M:online, H*r:encrypted, H*MI:sk:87mucwv X-HELO: mailout07.t-online.de Received: from mailout07.t-online.de (HELO mailout07.t-online.de) (194.25.134.83) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 00:03:45 +0000 Received: from fwd25.aul.t-online.de (fwd25.aul.t-online.de [172.20.26.130]) by mailout07.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CFD54214148; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 01:03:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from sweetums.local (SOLwwrZJwhgTKtJLVWEt2RHqQ-GrHy6GX5lebiFgiNuBku7KwEn4eBXqH1cKrLtwD3@[84.128.94.135]) by fwd25.t-online.de with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) esmtp id 1iVlZ0-1HMoCG0; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 01:03:42 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Eliminate cc0 from m68k To: Andreas Schwab Cc: GCC Patches References: <8736epw8rq.fsf@igel.home> <87y2whumio.fsf@igel.home> <87r228vm1y.fsf@igel.home> <20df1e21-08e5-2b60-7cf7-b6785f4ec7fc@t-online.de> <87mucwvjng.fsf@igel.home> From: Bernd Schmidt Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 00:17:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87mucwvjng.fsf@igel.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-11/txt/msg01503.txt.bz2 On 11/15/19 11:50 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Nov 15 2019, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > >> I meant the compiler command line of course... for any -mcpu flags that >> might differ from my test run. > > There are none. Well, there has to be some difference between what you are doing and what I am doing, because: Running /local/src/egcs/git/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/old-deja.exp ... === g++ Summary === # of expected passes 26826 # of expected failures 82 # of unsupported tests 157 /local/src/egcs/bm68k-test/gcc/xg++ version 10.0.0 20191101 (experimental) (GCC) Is there anything you think you can give me to help reproduce this? Before/after assembly files, generated with -fverbose-asm? Bernd