From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 98479 invoked by alias); 26 May 2017 11:35:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 98448 invoked by uid 89); 26 May 2017 11:35:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=udr X-HELO: mail-yw0-f194.google.com Received: from mail-yw0-f194.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f194.google.com) (209.85.161.194) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 May 2017 11:35:47 +0000 Received: by mail-yw0-f194.google.com with SMTP id h82so453455ywb.3 for ; Fri, 26 May 2017 04:35:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=J5WiefQ/9wO9C1i2YcZjK+pc0PSOGkjZiK0/HBKhv5U=; b=nr24yFz9leTSRoSMY9GuYExJHyAjZVUr1VRnT/Vq062erHn6WqbxLgayWuoIz77q1y +xe0CRx5mlKNMYMCgCv+w0Yx2Xq+JMmFvfpPIKCUSyqmxTO7DJC3MnhjPa0h0lzxOo3c PaTrA4zttLiJn4D3NXJ1nI1cJRQX1gCUm+barSZp8k8WSqZVvGbybtwlWf1j6Ana9DNv 4NhLtiNGKZPImxTigDmqrBVecga2Zn2GPcpAOyis4JF3xk4sp3c5N4faPrsVVtJSEuzF +JiAzkI8Qo3uWjVPFDpwqR2+90xb/iR6MbAAG4ursxQnR2ubJ8leXk4FITj+7TwDnXTt W5Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDXfEK81SwQQ4YfM/B0Y1GdSPgJIoidnFZjmt0ujiia0AS6+TW4 Eej5xx0cPxxcrGMo X-Received: by 10.129.156.5 with SMTP id t5mr1196555ywg.257.1495798549810; Fri, 26 May 2017 04:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2620:10d:c0a3:20fb:f6d0:5ac5:64cd:f102? ([2620:10d:c091:200::2:a1d1]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d200sm185537ywh.74.2017.05.26.04.35.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 May 2017 04:35:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [C++ PATCH] Reimplement ADL To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: GCC Patches References: <4f2b3ce9-7f06-6a10-f1c9-4542b3651bd0@acm.org> <20170526075453.GJ8499@tucnak> From: Nathan Sidwell Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 11:38:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170526075453.GJ8499@tucnak> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------C2357985F27CD053FFC968E9" X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg02027.txt.bz2 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------C2357985F27CD053FFC968E9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-length: 404 On 05/26/2017 03:54 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 09:03:31AM -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote: >> This patch reimplements ADL. > I believe this broke > FAIL: libgomp.c++/udr-12.C (test for excess errors) > UNRESOLVED: libgomp.c++/udr-12.C compilation failed to produce executable In answer to my own question, Yes. Yes we should ADL the type. Fixed thusly. nathan -- Nathan Sidwell --------------C2357985F27CD053FFC968E9 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="udr.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="udr.diff" Content-length: 719 2017-05-26 Nathan Sidwell * name-lookup.c (name_lookup::search_adl): ADL OMP UDR type args. Index: name-lookup.c =================================================================== --- name-lookup.c (revision 248488) +++ name-lookup.c (working copy) @@ -998,9 +998,11 @@ name_lookup::search_adl (tree fns, vec