From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: Jin Ma <jinma@linux.alibaba.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: palmer@dabbelt.com, richard.sandiford@arm.com,
kito.cheng@gmail.com, philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu,
christoph.muellner@vrull.eu, rdapp.gcc@gmail.com,
juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai, vineetg@rivosinc.com,
jinma.contrib@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] In the pipeline, USE or CLOBBER should delay execution if it starts a new live range.
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 13:12:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9efdc6c-345f-4e06-b5f5-a90fca108dcf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230814112255.2071-1-jinma@linux.alibaba.com>
On 8/14/23 05:22, Jin Ma wrote:
> CLOBBER and USE does not represent real instructions, but in the
> process of pipeline optimization, they will wait for transmission
> in ready list like other insns, without considering resource
> conflicts and cycles. This results in a multi-issue CPU architecture
> that can be issued at any time if other regular insns have resource
> conflicts or cannot be launched for other reasons. As a result,
> its position is advanced in the generated insns sequence, which
> will affect register allocation and often lead to more redundant
> mov instructions.
>
> A simple example:
> https://github.com/majin2020/gcc-test/blob/master/test.c
> This is a function in the dhrystone benchmark.
>
> https://github.com/majin2020/gcc-test/blob/0b08c1a13de9663d7d9aba7539b960ec0607ca24/test.c.299r.sched1
> This is a log of the pass 'sched1' When -mtune=rocket but issue_rate == 2.
>
> The pipeline is:
> ;; | insn | prio |
> ;; | 17 | 3 | r142=a0 alu
> ;; | 14 | 0 | clobber r136 nothing
> ;; | 13 | 0 | clobber a0 nothing
> ;; | 18 | 2 | r143=a1 alu
> ...
> ;; | 12 | 0 | a0=r136 alu
> ;; | 15 | 0 | use a0 nothing
>
> In this log, insn 13 and 14 are much ahead of schedule, which risks generating
> redundant mov instructions, which seems unreasonable.
>
> Therefore, I submit patch again on the basis of the last review
> opinions to try to solve this problem.
>
> https://github.com/majin2020/gcc-test/commit/efcb43e3369e771bde702955048bfe3f501263dd#diff-805031b1be5092a2322852a248d0b0f92eef7cad5784a8209f4dfc6221407457L189
> This is the diff log of shed1 after patch is added.
>
> The new pipeline is:
> ;; | insn | prio |
> ;; | 17 | 3 | r142=a0 alu
> ...
> ;; | 10 | 0 | [r144]=r141 alu
> ;; | 13 | 0 | clobber a0 nothing
> ;; | 14 | 0 | clobber r136 nothing
> ;; | 12 | 0 | a0=r136 alu
> ;; | 15 | 0 | use a0 nothing
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> * haifa-sched.cc (use_or_clobber_starts_range_p): New.
> (prune_ready_list): USE or CLOBBER should delay execution
> if it starts a new live range.
OK for the trunk. It doesn't look like you have write access and I
don't see anything about what testing was done. Standard practice is to
do a bootstrap and regression test on a primary platform such as x86,
aarch64, ppc64.
I went ahead and did a bootstrap and regression test on x86_64, then
pushed this to the trunk.
Thanks for your patience,
jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-11 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-23 8:07 [PATCH] In the ready lists of pipeline, put unrecog insns (such as CLOBBER,USE) at the latest to issue Jin Ma
2023-03-27 17:01 ` [PATCH] In the ready lists of pipeline, put unrecog insns (such as CLOBBER, USE) " Richard Sandiford
2023-04-14 21:38 ` Jeff Law
2023-05-29 10:51 ` [PATCH] In the pipeline, UNRECOG INSN is not executed in advance if it starts a live range Jin Ma
2023-06-08 1:50 ` Jin Ma
2023-06-09 23:40 ` Jeff Law
2023-06-12 3:38 ` Jin Ma
2023-11-11 18:51 ` Jeff Law
2023-08-14 11:22 ` [PATCH v2] In the pipeline, USE or CLOBBER should delay execution if it starts a new " Jin Ma
2023-08-29 8:00 ` Jin Ma
2023-11-11 20:12 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2023-11-12 17:41 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-12 18:02 ` Jeff Law
2023-11-12 18:11 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-11-13 2:16 ` Jin Ma
2023-11-13 2:28 ` Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d9efdc6c-345f-4e06-b5f5-a90fca108dcf@gmail.com \
--to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=christoph.muellner@vrull.eu \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jinma.contrib@gmail.com \
--cc=jinma@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
--cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
--cc=rdapp.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=vineetg@rivosinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).