From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 096113858D32 for ; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 21:14:57 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 096113858D32 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DA733E9C; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 16:14:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from naga.localdomain (188-23-1-149.adsl.highway.telekom.at [188.23.1.149]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10B8433E86; Sat, 11 Feb 2023 16:14:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2023 22:14:52 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: NightStrike , Martin Liska cc: Jonathan Yong <10walls@gmail.com>, i.nixman@autistici.org, GCC Patches Subject: Re: realpath() patch to fix symlinks resolution for win32 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <7c061f6c1c090362efbbcb9af9f6c758@autistici.org> <54490915-223c-d6b2-ff30-09ac3da8325f@gmail.com> <96e29f7a-4662-f0a2-0d97-13b3dd91d5a1@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.10 on 209.68.5.143 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Sat, 11 Feb 2023, NightStrike wrote: >>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108350 > I would have expected the PR to have been automatically updated based on > the commit email. Any idea why that didn't happen? Not to change the state > to closed, but to add the commit information as a reply. I assume the fact that the PR reference was spelt as PR/108350 without a slash, not a blank, after "PR" may be responsible for the missing Bugzilla comment. The documented format - per gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html - is PR component/12345 Martin? (By the way, where does one best have a look at those hooks? .git/hooks in the main repository isn't it, it appears?) Gerald