Re: [PATCH] Avoid ICE in single-bit logical RMWs on m68k-uclinux [PR108640]

[Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>]

On 1/18/24 09:39, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> When generating RMW logical operations on m68k, the backend
> recognizes single-bit operations and rewrites them as bit
> instructions on operands adjusted to address the intended byte.
> When offsetting the addresses the backend keeps the modes as
> SImode, even though the actual access will be in QImode.
> 
> The uclinux target defines M68K_OFFSETS_MUST_BE_WITHIN_SECTIONS_P
> which adds a check that the adjusted operand is within the bounds
> of the original object.  Since the address has been offset it is
> not, and the compiler ICEs.
> 
> The bug is that the modes of the adjusted operands should have been
> narrowed to QImode, which is that this patch does.  Nearby code
> which narrows to HImode gets that right.
> 
> Bootstrapped and regression tested on m68k-linux-gnu.
> 
> Ok for master? (Note: I don't have commit rights.)
> 
> gcc/
> 
> 	PR target/108640
> 	* config/m68k/m68k.cc (output_andsi3): Use QImode for
> 	address adjusted for 1-byte RMW access.
> 	(output_iorsi3): Likewise.
> 	(output_xorsi3): Likewise.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/
> 
> 	PR target/108640
> 	* gcc.target/m68k/pr108640.c: New test.
While not really a regression, this can clearly only affect the m68k 
target and fixes an ICE.  So I went ahead and pushed it to the trunk.

Just a note for the future, the test really isn't m68k specific in that 
it should compile just fine on any target GCC supports.  It just 
happened to ICE on the m68k.  We generally prefer to put such tests in 
target independent directories.  dg-torture, c-torture would be better 
choices for this kind of test in the future.

Thanks.

Jeff