public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>,
	Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>,
	Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Ping: [PATCH] testsuite/C++: suppress filename canonicalization in module tests
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:59:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dc2ee14b-39e1-391a-c68e-960217b0c416@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a65e21d-b382-01bd-27ef-5d267f6b7ce5@acm.org>

On 28.04.2023 00:24, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 4/25/23 11:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 28.06.2022 16:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> The pathname underneath gcm.cache/ is determined from the effective name
>>> used for the main input file of a particular module. When modules are
>>> built, no canonicalization occurs for the main input file. Hence the
>>> module file wouldn't be found if a different (the canonicalized) file
>>> name was used when importing that same module. (This is an effect of
>>> importing happening in the preprocessor, just like #include handling.)
>>>
>>> Since it doesn't look easy to make module generation use libcpp's
>>> maybe_shorter_path() (in fact I'd consider this a layering violation,
>>> while cloning the logic would - at least in principle - be prone to both
>>> going out of sync), simply suppress system header path canonicalization
>>> for the respective tests.
>>
>> Ping: This still looks to apply as is.
> 
> ok -- I was unaware of this.  might be sensible to file a defect about this?

Sure: 109660.

Jan

      reply	other threads:[~2023-04-28  6:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-28 14:06 Jan Beulich
2023-04-25 15:04 ` Ping: " Jan Beulich
2023-04-27 22:24   ` Nathan Sidwell
2023-04-28  6:59     ` Jan Beulich [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dc2ee14b-39e1-391a-c68e-960217b0c416@suse.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=mikestump@comcast.net \
    --cc=nathan@acm.org \
    --cc=ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).