From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 84362 invoked by alias); 19 May 2016 23:30:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 84327 invoked by uid 89); 19 May 2016 23:30:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:271 X-HELO: mail-qk0-f172.google.com Received: from mail-qk0-f172.google.com (HELO mail-qk0-f172.google.com) (209.85.220.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 19 May 2016 23:30:47 +0000 Received: by mail-qk0-f172.google.com with SMTP id n62so51172664qkc.2 for ; Thu, 19 May 2016 16:30:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L4OhH33AZw9dEPp8UaJ5moKzNbwHixRQRRDAqTwECVs=; b=EmdlkbRvCKEwo4fdCWfKRfbrIC9LDMVq04W+J+dMLUudsEMs4DeG2G2G+Qz2ePBVpI PAjHeY36eiGpZ8RyjGFsvdr+Sn7wF7iUMwLY0QjuQ1ZbOEEW35qbM4oJXy3x1lFk07cL Ef3mZXmFHsVc2t6JizDkg5sQ9/IMoC41ZB52nt7iNqYgYK+kiUYCVHpo1OV8GyLZ6e2H mBcHKaqb6nCOqFWbI/2Ioj8adbJ+T3qET6UwrDO29kCV+bTfZQ8G3zPdCTP194DYd0hH KPJ2kI8CNQ3WUWPonJD05/ZiKgqu+ENjcBwHDn99sfH/rDvpkfH1WZQ9jBcgBKkTjQc5 W6Lw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FW3CaTZZ0pbrUUj3R0ENRWNJA/YLbkiy3R9iIz375sVEuDtfpEfvHpVlniIBKiU8w== X-Received: by 10.55.169.204 with SMTP id s195mr11937704qke.107.1463700645864; Thu, 19 May 2016 16:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:181:c003:1930:a2a8:cdff:fe3e:b48? ([2601:181:c003:1930:a2a8:cdff:fe3e:b48]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r6sm7679400qkh.4.2016.05.19.16.30.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 19 May 2016 16:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: inhibit the sincos optimization when the target has sin and cos instructions To: Cesar Philippidis , Alexander Monakov References: <573628A1.1030501@codesourcery.com> <862033F1-A268-4236-B908-558C102199B5@gmail.com> <573B88B0.2080508@codesourcery.com> <573B8D84.4070908@codesourcery.com> <15446f73-b60a-c3f2-321e-80e0038785f1@acm.org> <573D3642.8080203@codesourcery.com> <573E08FC.4000605@codesourcery.com> Cc: Andrew Pinski , Richard Biener , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" From: Nathan Sidwell Message-ID: Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 23:30:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <573E08FC.4000605@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg01591.txt.bz2 On 05/19/16 14:42, Cesar Philippidis wrote: > + "operands[2] = make_safe_from (operands[2], operands[0]);" Please use { ... } rather than "" for readability. Ok with that change. nathan