From: chenglulu <chenglulu@loongson.cn>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: i@xen0n.name, xuchenghua@loongson.cn, c@jia.je
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] LoongArch: Replace -mexplicit-relocs=auto simple-used address peephole2 with combine
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 15:57:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd1c8651-d9ab-1678-4501-0c62f4966149@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231228161611.10555-1-xry111@xry111.site>
在 2023/12/29 上午12:11, Xi Ruoyao 写道:
> The problem with peephole2 is it uses a naive sliding-window algorithm
> and misses many cases. For example:
>
> float a[10000];
> float t() { return a[0] + a[8000]; }
>
> is compiled to:
>
> la.local $r13,a
> la.local $r12,a+32768
> fld.s $f1,$r13,0
> fld.s $f0,$r12,-768
> fadd.s $f0,$f1,$f0
>
> by trunk. But as we've explained in r14-4851, the following would be
> better with -mexplicit-relocs=auto:
>
> pcalau12i $r13,%pc_hi20(a)
> pcalau12i $r12,%pc_hi20(a+32000)
> fld.s $f1,$r13,%pc_lo12(a)
> fld.s $f0,$r12,%pc_lo12(a+32000)
> fadd.s $f0,$f1,$f0
>
> However the sliding-window algorithm just won't detect the pcalau12i/fld
> pair to be optimized. Use a define_insn_and_split in combine pass will
> work around the issue.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/loongarch/predicates.md
> (symbolic_pcrel_offset_operand): New define_predicate.
> (mem_simple_ldst_operand): Likewise.
> * config/loongarch/loongarch-protos.h
> (loongarch_rewrite_mem_for_simple_ldst): Declare.
> * config/loongarch/loongarch.cc
> (loongarch_rewrite_mem_for_simple_ldst): Implement.
> * config/loongarch/loongarch.md (simple_load<mode>): New
> define_insn_and_rewrite.
> (simple_load_<su>ext<SUBDI:mode><GPR:mode>): Likewise.
> (simple_store<mode>): Likewise.
> (define_peephole2): Remove la.local/[f]ld peepholes.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.target/loongarch/explicit-relocs-auto-single-load-store-2.c:
> New test.
> * gcc.target/loongarch/explicit-relocs-auto-single-load-store-3.c:
> New test.
> ---
>
> Changes from [v2]:
> - Match (mem (symbol_ref ...)) instead of (symbol_ref ...) to retain the
> attributes of the MEM.
> - Add a test to make sure the attributes of the MEM is retained.
>
> [v2]:https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/641430.html
>
> Bootstrapped & regtestd on loongarch64-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk?
>
> gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch-protos.h | 1 +
> gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.cc | 16 +++
> gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md | 114 +++++-------------
> gcc/config/loongarch/predicates.md | 13 ++
> ...explicit-relocs-auto-single-load-store-2.c | 11 ++
> ...explicit-relocs-auto-single-load-store-3.c | 18 +++
> 6 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/explicit-relocs-auto-single-load-store-2.c
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/loongarch/explicit-relocs-auto-single-load-store-3.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch-protos.h b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch-protos.h
/* snip */
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md b/gcc/config/loongarch/loongarch.md
/* snip */
> +(define_insn_and_rewrite "simple_load<mode>"
> + [(set (match_operand:LD_AT_LEAST_32_BIT 0 "register_operand" "=r,f")
> + (match_operand:LD_AT_LEAST_32_BIT 1 "mem_simple_ldst_operand" ""))]
> + "loongarch_pre_reload_split () \
> + && la_opt_explicit_relocs == EXPLICIT_RELOCS_AUTO \
Is the '\' here dispensable? I don't seem to have added it when I wrote
the conditions.
> + && (TARGET_CMODEL_NORMAL || TARGET_CMODEL_MEDIUM)"
> + "#"
> + "&& true"
> {
> - emit_insn (gen_pcalau12i_gr<P:mode> (operands[0], operands[1]));
> + operands[1] = loongarch_rewrite_mem_for_simple_ldst (operands[1]);
> })
/* snip */
> ;; Synchronization instructions.
> diff --git a/gcc/config/loongarch/predicates.md b/gcc/config/loongarch/predicates.md
> index 83fea08315c..2158fe7538c 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/loongarch/predicates.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/loongarch/predicates.md
> @@ -579,6 +579,19 @@ (define_predicate "symbolic_pcrel_operand"
> return loongarch_symbolic_constant_p (op, &type) && type == SYMBOL_PCREL;
> })
>
> +(define_predicate "symbolic_pcrel_offset_operand"
> + (and (match_code "plus")
> + (match_operand 0 "symbolic_pcrel_operand")
> + (match_operand 1 "const_int_operand")))
> +
> +(define_predicate "mem_simple_ldst_operand"
> + (match_code "mem")
> +{
> + op = XEXP (op, 0);
> + return symbolic_pcrel_operand (op, Pmode) ||
> + symbolic_pcrel_offset_operand (op, Pmode);
> +})
> +
>
Symbol '||' It shouldn't be at the end of the line.
+ return symbolic_pcrel_operand (op, Pmode)
+ || symbolic_pcrel_offset_operand (op, Pmode);
Others LGTM.
Thanks!
/* snip */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-29 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-28 16:11 Xi Ruoyao
2023-12-29 7:57 ` chenglulu [this message]
2023-12-29 11:55 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-12-29 12:11 ` Pushed: [PATCH v4] " Xi Ruoyao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd1c8651-d9ab-1678-4501-0c62f4966149@loongson.cn \
--to=chenglulu@loongson.cn \
--cc=c@jia.je \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=i@xen0n.name \
--cc=xry111@xry111.site \
--cc=xuchenghua@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).