From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18764 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2008 22:39:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 18750 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Mar 2008 22:39:19 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:38:55 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 28so3915275wfc.14 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:38:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.161.3 with SMTP id n3mr1933383wfo.32.1206657534072; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:38:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.239.20 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:38:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:56:00 -0000 From: "Andrew Pinski" To: "Kaveh R. GHAZI" Subject: Re: [C++/Obj-C++ PATCH] Fix Objective-C++ breakage Cc: "Mark Mitchell" , "Joseph S. Myers" , "Steven Bosscher" , "GCC Patches" , bonzini@gnu.org, stanshebs@earthlink.net In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <571f6b510803270132w3159d14apeee2b3698114a5a8@mail.gmail.com> <47EBDC2C.4020701@codesourcery.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg01742.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote: > I think a middle ground could be that we enable building objc++ by > default, but not run its testsuite unless it is specifically enabled. The testsuite for Objective-C++ is so small, it is not even a blimp in my testing time. So I don't think this is a good middle ground. -- Pinski