public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>,
	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: error with bit-fields and scoped enums [PR111895]
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 16:46:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <de9f6c25-7bdf-493a-96ab-8b32c4f13ba4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231024161843.20031-1-polacek@redhat.com>

On 10/24/23 12:18, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
> 
> -- >8 --
> Here we issue a bogus error: invalid operands of types 'unsigned char:2'
> and 'int' to binary 'operator!=' when casting a bit-field of scoped enum
> type to bool.
> 
> In build_static_cast_1, perform_direct_initialization_if_possible returns
> NULL_TREE, because the invented declaration T t(e) fails, which is
> correct.  So we go down to ocp_convert, which has code to deal with this
> case:
>            /* We can't implicitly convert a scoped enum to bool, so convert
>               to the underlying type first.  */
>            if (SCOPED_ENUM_P (intype) && (convtype & CONV_STATIC))
>              e = build_nop (ENUM_UNDERLYING_TYPE (intype), e);
> but the SCOPED_ENUM_P is false since intype is <unnamed-unsigned:2>.
> This could be fixed by using unlowered_expr_type.  But then
> c_common_truthvalue_conversion/CASE_CONVERT has a similar problem, and
> unlowered_expr_type is a C++-only function.
> 
> Rather than adding a dummy unlowered_expr_type to C, I think we should
> follow [expr.static.cast]p3: "the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion is applied
> to the bit-field and the resulting prvalue is used as the operand of the
> static_cast."  There are no prvalue bit-fields, so the l-to-r conversion
> will get us an expression whose type is the enum.  (I thought we didn't
> need decay_conversion because that does a whole lot more but using it
> would make sense to me too.)

It's possible that we might want some of that more, particularly 
mark_rvalue_use; decay_conversion seems like the right answer.  OK with 
that change.

rvalue() would also make sense, though that seems to be missing a call 
to unlowered_expr_type at the moment.  In fact, after "otherwise, it's 
the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion" in decay_conv should probably just be a 
call to rvalue, with missing bits added to the latter function.

Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-24 20:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-24 16:18 Marek Polacek
2023-10-24 20:46 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2023-10-24 20:56   ` Marek Polacek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=de9f6c25-7bdf-493a-96ab-8b32c4f13ba4@redhat.com \
    --to=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=polacek@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).