From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3CE9382D506 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:47:18 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A3CE9382D506 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 259NsnPC024075; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:47:17 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gktxxrpyv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:47:17 +0000 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25A0j2CF023583; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:47:16 GMT Received: from ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (62.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gktxxrpyg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:47:16 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 25A0bGx1005498; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:47:14 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma03ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3gfy19fhpc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:47:14 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 25A0lA0O9961918 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:47:11 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C764211C050; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:47:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41EB11C04A; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:47:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.197.228.102] (unknown [9.197.228.102]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:47:08 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 08:47:07 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4, rs6000] Implemented f[min/max]_optab by xs[min/max]dp [PR103605] Content-Language: en-US To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: gcc-patches , David , "Kewen.Lin" , Peter Bergner References: <20220608132435.GN25951@gate.crashing.org> <3e038980-615e-b465-d2a0-010ba1205fe0@linux.ibm.com> <20220609150759.GP25951@gate.crashing.org> From: HAO CHEN GUI In-Reply-To: <20220609150759.GP25951@gate.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: PY66BWxwYUrHOBvQoIxiGDOVCle6s6Xu X-Proofpoint-GUID: oGteuQSvh2jsePaMyj1hSoVX1gYFfoyz X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.874,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-06-09_16,2022-06-09_02,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=787 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206100000 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:47:20 -0000 On 9/6/2022 下午 11:07, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Ah, good. Should we then have an assert that there is no fast-math if > we ever get the rtl fmin/fmax stuff? Sure, I will add a condition for it. Thanks a lot. Gui Haochen