public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, jason@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] constexprify some tree variables
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 09:45:35 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <df5b4bed-58d6-17c4-a1b9-6611a4cf4113@idea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1668794731-9349-1-git-send-email-apinski@marvell.com>

On Fri, 18 Nov 2022, apinski--- via Gcc-patches wrote:

> From: Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>
> 
> Since we use C++11 by default now, we can
> use constexpr for some const decls in tree-core.h.
> 
> This patch does that and it allows for better optimizations
> of GCC code with checking enabled and without LTO.
> 
> For an example generic-match.cc compiling is speed up due
> to the less number of basic blocks and less debugging info
> produced. I did not check the speed of compiling the same source
> but rather the speed of compiling the old vs new sources here
> (but with the same compiler base).
> 
> The small slow down in the parsing of the arrays in each TU
> is migrated by a speed up in how much code/debugging info
> is produced in the end.
> 
> Note I looked at generic-match.cc since it is one of the
> compiling sources which causes parallel building to stall and
> I wanted to speed it up.
> 
> OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
> Or should this wait until GCC 13 branches off?
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	PR middle-end/14840
> 	* tree-core.h (tree_code_type): Constexprify
> 	by including all-tree.def.
> 	(tree_code_length): Likewise.
> 	* tree.cc (tree_code_type): Remove.
> 	(tree_code_length): Remove.
> ---
>  gcc/tree-core.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
>  gcc/tree.cc     | 24 ------------------------
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-core.h b/gcc/tree-core.h
> index af75522504f..e146b133dbd 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-core.h
> +++ b/gcc/tree-core.h
> @@ -2284,15 +2284,32 @@ struct floatn_type_info {
>  /* Matrix describing the structures contained in a given tree code.  */
>  extern bool tree_contains_struct[MAX_TREE_CODES][64];
>  
> +#define DEFTREECODE(SYM, NAME, TYPE, LENGTH) TYPE,
> +#define END_OF_BASE_TREE_CODES tcc_exceptional,
> +
> +
>  /* Class of tree given its code.  */
> -extern const enum tree_code_class tree_code_type[];
> +constexpr enum tree_code_class tree_code_type[] = {
> +#include "all-tree.def"
> +};
> +
> +#undef DEFTREECODE
> +#undef END_OF_BASE_TREE_CODES
>  
>  /* Each tree code class has an associated string representation.
>     These must correspond to the tree_code_class entries.  */
>  extern const char *const tree_code_class_strings[];
>  
>  /* Number of argument-words in each kind of tree-node.  */
> -extern const unsigned char tree_code_length[];
> +
> +#define DEFTREECODE(SYM, NAME, TYPE, LENGTH) LENGTH,
> +#define END_OF_BASE_TREE_CODES 0,
> +constexpr unsigned char tree_code_length[] = {
> +#include "all-tree.def"
> +};
> +
> +#undef DEFTREECODE
> +#undef END_OF_BASE_TREE_CODES

IIUC defining these globals as non-inline constexpr gives them internal
linkage, and so each TU contains its own unique copy of these globals.
This bloats cc1plus by a tiny bit and is technically an ODR violation
because some inline functions such as tree_class_check also ODR-use
these variables and so each defn of tree_class_check will refer to a
"different" tree_code_class.  Since inline variables are a C++17
feature, I guess we could fix this by defining the globals the old way
before C++17 and as inline constexpr otherwise?

>  
>  /* Vector of all alias pairs for global symbols.  */
>  extern GTY(()) vec<alias_pair, va_gc> *alias_pairs;
> diff --git a/gcc/tree.cc b/gcc/tree.cc
> index 574bd2e65d9..254b2373dcf 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree.cc
> @@ -74,31 +74,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
>  #include "asan.h"
>  #include "ubsan.h"
>  
> -/* Tree code classes.  */
>  
> -#define DEFTREECODE(SYM, NAME, TYPE, LENGTH) TYPE,
> -#define END_OF_BASE_TREE_CODES tcc_exceptional,
> -
> -const enum tree_code_class tree_code_type[] = {
> -#include "all-tree.def"
> -};
> -
> -#undef DEFTREECODE
> -#undef END_OF_BASE_TREE_CODES
> -
> -/* Table indexed by tree code giving number of expression
> -   operands beyond the fixed part of the node structure.
> -   Not used for types or decls.  */
> -
> -#define DEFTREECODE(SYM, NAME, TYPE, LENGTH) LENGTH,
> -#define END_OF_BASE_TREE_CODES 0,
> -
> -const unsigned char tree_code_length[] = {
> -#include "all-tree.def"
> -};
> -
> -#undef DEFTREECODE
> -#undef END_OF_BASE_TREE_CODES
>  
>  /* Names of tree components.
>     Used for printing out the tree and error messages.  */
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-26 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-18 18:05 apinski
2022-11-18 20:06 ` Jeff Law
2022-11-19  2:53   ` Andrew Pinski
2022-11-19 16:33     ` Jeff Law
2023-01-26 14:45 ` Patrick Palka [this message]
2023-01-26 14:51   ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-26 14:58     ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-26 15:59   ` [PATCH] tree: Fix up tree_code_{length,type} Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-26 18:03     ` Patrick Palka
2023-01-27 12:40       ` Patrick Palka
2023-01-27 13:14         ` Richard Biener
2023-01-27  7:42     ` Richard Biener
2023-01-27  8:57       ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-01-27  9:49         ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=df5b4bed-58d6-17c4-a1b9-6611a4cf4113@idea \
    --to=ppalka@redhat.com \
    --cc=apinski@marvell.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).