public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] c++: remove lookup_template_class's entering_scope flag
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 16:52:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2179163-05b5-44ec-91e5-05f1204e4757@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <823f5898-02d1-e6a3-8e18-aa3695193a0f@idea>

On 5/1/24 13:40, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Wed, 1 May 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
> 
>> On 5/1/24 12:41, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux, does this look like
>>>> an improvement?  This is not a bugfix and barely related to the previous
>>>> patch, but the previous patch's new use of entering_scope=true motivated
>>>> me to submit this patch since it seems like a nice simplification.
>>>
>>> Ping, now that stage 1 is open.
>>
>> Thanks for the ping.  The earlier message isn't showing up in Thunderbird for
>> some reason, though I see it in the gmail web interface...
> 
> Ah, weird.  No worries, this patch was very much stage 1 material anyway.
> 
>>
>>>> @@ -16771,9 +16722,10 @@ tsubst (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t
>>>> complain, tree in_decl)
>>>>    	    ctx = TREE_VEC_ELT (ctx, 0);
>>>>    	  }
>>>>    	else
>>>> -	  ctx = tsubst_aggr_type (ctx, args,
>>>> -				  complain | tf_qualifying_scope,
>>>> -				  in_decl, /*entering_scope=*/1);
>>>> +	  {
>>>> +	    ctx = tsubst_scope (ctx, args, complain, in_decl);
>>
>> Why is this one tsubst_scope while the others are all plain tsubst?
> 
> Ah, just because the call to tsubst_aggr_type being replace passes
> tf_qualifying_scope already, so we might as well use tsubst_scope
> as shorthand.
> 
>> Do we want a tsubst_entering_scope function?
> 
> Which is just shorthand for tsubst + adjust_type_for_entering_scope?

That's what I was thinking.

> Sure, though I was wondering if we eventually might want to get rid of
> the distinction between the primary template type A<T> and the generic
> instantiation A<T>, and we could treat this as an incremental step
> towards that (then we'd just eventually remove the
> adjust_type_for_entering_scope calls and keep the tsubst calls).

I don't think we want that; having the distinction helps to avoid 
wrongly looking up members of the primary template in contexts that 
shouldn't be able to.

Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-01 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-02 19:41 [PATCH 1/2] c++: requires-exprs and partial constraint subst [PR112769] Patrick Palka
2024-02-02 19:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] c++: remove lookup_template_class's entering_scope flag Patrick Palka
2024-05-01 19:41   ` Patrick Palka
2024-05-01 20:22     ` Jason Merrill
2024-05-01 20:40       ` Patrick Palka
2024-05-01 20:52         ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2024-05-02 17:49           ` Patrick Palka
2024-05-02 18:11             ` Jason Merrill
2024-02-02 19:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] c++: requires-exprs and partial constraint subst [PR112769] Jason Merrill
2024-02-02 20:01 ` Jason Merrill
2024-02-02 20:36   ` Patrick Palka
2024-02-02 20:57     ` Patrick Palka
2024-02-02 21:05       ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e2179163-05b5-44ec-91e5-05f1204e4757@redhat.com \
    --to=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=ppalka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).