Hi!

Thanks for the feedback.
Attached is an updated patch where I switched to the NOP define instead.
I'm not sure if stack-usage-naked.c should be moved to gcc.dg-tree, or 
if it should skip using the nop.h file (it feels wrong to do #include 
"../../gcc.dg/nop.h" from within gcc.taget-tree).

Torbjörn

On 27/11/2018 19:40, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 02:02:49PM +0000, Torbjorn SVENSSON wrote:
>> Attached is a small patch that, in case of inline assembler code,
>> indicates that the function stack usage is uncertain due to inline
>> assembler.
>>
>> The test suite are using "nop" as an assembler instruction on all
>> targets, is this acceptable or is there a better way to test this?
> Maybe see testsuite/gcc.dg/nop.h ?
>
>
> Segher